• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸段食管癌扩大根治性食管切除术的疗效

Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Suzuki S, Kuwabara S, Hatakeyama K

机构信息

First Department of Surgery, Niigata University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Mar;186(3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00013-1.

DOI:10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00013-1
PMID:9510261
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Great controversy exists concerning the adequate extent of esophagectomy for cure in patients with esophageal cancer. Extended radical esophagectomy combined with three-field lymphadenectomy has been performed to improve the cure rates for patients with the disease in Japan. The purposes of this study were to assess the mortality and morbidity rates after extended radical esophagectomy and to determine the oncologic indications for this procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed 190 patients who underwent extended radical esophagectomy for invasive esophageal cancer. The procedures were performed prospectively between 1982 and 1996.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, and morbidity rates were 1.6%, 4.7%, and 58.4%, respectively. The most common postoperative complication was vocal-cord paralysis (45.3%), followed by major pulmonary complications (21.6%). The overall survival rate for the 190 patients was 41.5% at 5 years, with a median followup period of 61 months. Some subgroups of patients had an extremely poor prognosis despite extended radical esophagectomy. Survival was < or = 5 years in all patients with five or more positive nodes; all patients with simultaneous metastases to the cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal lymph nodes; and all patients with cervical metastases from a lower esophageal tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended radical esophagectomy is potentially associated with high morbidity rates although the mortality rates are acceptable, suggesting the necessity of careful patient selection. This procedure is indicated oncologically only for patients with four or fewer metastatic nodes or with metastases confined to one or two of the three anatomic compartments (neck, mediastinum, and abdomen) from upper or midesophageal tumors.

摘要

背景

对于食管癌患者为达到治愈目的而行食管切除术的合适范围存在很大争议。在日本,已开展扩大根治性食管切除术联合三野淋巴结清扫术以提高该病患者的治愈率。本研究的目的是评估扩大根治性食管切除术后的死亡率和发病率,并确定该手术的肿瘤学指征。

研究设计

我们回顾了190例行扩大根治性食管切除术治疗浸润性食管癌的患者。这些手术于1982年至1996年间前瞻性进行。

结果

30天死亡率、住院死亡率和发病率分别为1.6%、4.7%和58.4%。最常见的术后并发症是声带麻痹(45.3%),其次是严重肺部并发症(21.6%)。190例患者的5年总生存率为41.5%,中位随访期为61个月。尽管进行了扩大根治性食管切除术,但部分患者亚组的预后极差。所有有五个或更多阳性淋巴结的患者、所有同时发生颈部、纵隔和腹部淋巴结转移的患者以及所有下段食管癌发生颈部转移的患者,其生存期均≤5年。

结论

扩大根治性食管切除术虽然死亡率可接受,但可能伴有高发病率,提示需要仔细选择患者。该手术在肿瘤学上仅适用于转移淋巴结为四个或更少,或转移局限于上中段食管癌三个解剖区域(颈部、纵隔和腹部)中的一个或两个区域的患者。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.胸段食管癌扩大根治性食管切除术的疗效
J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Mar;186(3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00013-1.
2
Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌扩大食管切除术加三野淋巴结清扫术的临床疗效
Am J Surg. 2005 Jan;189(1):98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.10.001.
3
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
4
Prognostic factors after extended esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.胸段食管鳞状细胞癌扩大食管切除术后的预后因素
J Surg Oncol. 1999 Oct;72(2):88-93. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199910)72:2<88::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-v.
5
[Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[胸段食管鳞状细胞癌两野与三野淋巴结清扫术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):990-994.
6
Number and location of positive nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and survival after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段食管鳞癌三野淋巴结清扫术后阳性淋巴结数目和部位、术后放疗与生存
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.037. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
7
Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy.扩大根治性食管切除术联合三野淋巴结清扫术后胸段食管癌的复发模式
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Feb;198(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.005.
8
Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.单孔纵隔镜辅助经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗胸段食管癌的围手术期结果
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox047.
9
Cervical lymph node metastasis classified as regional nodal staging in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical esophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection.在根治性食管切除术和三野淋巴结清扫术后,颈淋巴结转移在胸段食管鳞状细胞癌中被归类为区域淋巴结分期。
BMC Surg. 2014 Dec 19;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-110.
10
Radical transhiatal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma.经裂孔根治性食管切除术联合二野淋巴结清扫及远端食管腺癌内剥脱术
World J Surg. 1997 Oct;21(8):822-31. doi: 10.1007/pl00024609.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-field vs two-field lymphadenectomy in thoracic ESCC patients: a multicenter randomized study (NST 1503).胸段食管鳞癌患者三野与两野淋巴结清扫术的多中心随机研究(NST 1503)
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2025 Jan 14;5(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Histological prognosticators in neoadjuvant naive oesophageal cancer patients.新辅助未治疗食管癌患者的组织学预后指标
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 9;408(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02927-z.
3
Comparative analysis of the outcomes of gastrectomy endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of gastric tube cancer after esophagectomy.
食管癌切除术后胃管癌行胃切除术、内镜黏膜切除术或内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗效果的比较分析
Glob Health Med. 2023 Feb 28;5(1):40-46. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2022.01059.
4
The Impact of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury on Prognosis After McKeown Esophagectomy for ESCC.喉返神经损伤对食管癌McKeown食管切除术后预后的影响。
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 24;13:1861-1868. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S298228. eCollection 2021.
5
Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IVa (T4b vs. N4) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on the Japanese Classification System: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.基于日本分类系统的IVa期(T4b与N4)食管鳞状细胞癌根治性放化疗的疗效:一项回顾性单中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 22;13(1):8. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010008.
6
The Value of Lymphadenectomy Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy in Carcinoma Esophagus: a Review.新辅助治疗后食管癌淋巴结清扫术的价值:综述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(3):538-548. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01156-w. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
The impact of cervical lymph node dissection on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy following transthoracic esophagectomy.胸内食管胃吻合术后行胸内淋巴结清扫术对胃酸和十二指肠胃食管反流的影响。
Surg Today. 2019 Dec;49(12):1029-1034. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01835-4. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
8
Hyperbilirubinemia predicts the infectious complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.高胆红素血症可预测食管癌食管切除术后的感染性并发症。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Feb 21;39:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.02.004. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Joint management format at the mixed-surgical intermediate care unit: an interrupted time series analysis.混合手术中级护理单元的联合管理模式:一项中断时间序列分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Oct 18;3(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000177. eCollection 2018.
10
Clinical value of a prophylactic minitracheostomy after esophagectomy: analysis in patients at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications.食管癌切除术后预防性微创气管切开术的临床价值:对术后肺部并发症高危患者的分析
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 1;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0321-z.