Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Poggio C E, Colombo A, Tartaglia G
Laboratory of the Functional Anatomy of the Stomatognathic Apparatus, University of Milan, Faculty of Medicine, Italy.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12(2):145-52.
The aim of this investigation was to determine whether attractive children differ in their three-dimensional facial characteristics from nonattractive children of the same age, race, and sex. The facial characteristics of 36 boys and 44 girls aged 8 to 9 years were investigated. Frontal and profile photographs were analyzed independently by 21 judges, and, for each view, four groups were obtained: attractive boys, nonattractive boys, attractive girls, and nonattractive girls. For each child, the three-dimensional coordinates of 16 standardized soft tissue facial landmarks were automatically collected using an infrared system and used to calculate several three-dimensional angles, linear distances, and linear distance ratios. Mean values were computed in the eight groups, and attractive and nonattractive children were compared within sex and view. Most children received a different esthetic evaluation in the separate frontal and profile assessments; concordance in both attractive and nonattractive groups was only 50%. Moreover, three-dimensional facial morphometry was not able to separate attractive and nonattractive children.
本研究的目的是确定有吸引力的儿童与同年龄、种族和性别的无吸引力儿童在三维面部特征上是否存在差异。对36名8至9岁的男孩和44名8至9岁的女孩的面部特征进行了研究。21名评判员独立分析了正面和侧面照片,对于每个视角,得到了四组:有吸引力的男孩、无吸引力的男孩、有吸引力的女孩和无吸引力的女孩。对于每个孩子,使用红外系统自动收集16个标准化软组织面部标志点的三维坐标,并用于计算几个三维角度、线性距离和线性距离比。计算了八组的平均值,并在性别和视角内比较了有吸引力和无吸引力的儿童。大多数儿童在单独的正面和侧面评估中得到了不同的审美评价;有吸引力和无吸引力组的一致性仅为50%。此外,三维面部形态测量法无法区分有吸引力和无吸引力的儿童。