Schumacher B, Pfeiffer D, Tebbenjohanns J, Lewalter T, Jung W, Lüderitz B
Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Feb;9(2):152-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00896.x.
Bidirectional conduction block at the subeustachian isthmus predicts long-term efficacy of atrial flutter ablation. Limited data are available on the incidence and outcome of minor conduction changes such as unidirectional or incomplete block. This prospective study sought to systematically assess discrete acute and long-term alterations of bidirectional conduction prior to a complete conduction block.
In 41 patients with type I atrial flutter, pulse propagation through the subeustachian isthmus during low lateral and proximal coronary sinus pacing was documented and analyzed following each consecutive radiofrequency (RF) application. In cases of altered conduction properties and noninducibility of atrial flutter, patients were followed-up for 12 months. Three sets of results were found. First, following RF application, 23 patients presented a progressive conduction delay prior to a complete conduction block. Second, RF application did not always affect counterclockwise and clockwise conduction simultaneously or to the same extent. In 13 patients, an initial alteration of counterclockwise conduction was present before an alteration of clockwise conduction; in 5 patients, clockwise conduction was primarily affected. Third, the recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter was 9% (2/22) in patients with a complete bidirectional conduction block, 54% (7/13) in patients with unidirectional conduction block, and 100% (6/6) in patients with sole bidirectional conduction delay.
In 50% of the patients, consecutive RF applications resulted primarily in a progressive conduction delay rather than a sudden conduction block. Since counterclockwise and clockwise conduction were not always affected simultaneously or to the same extent, lateral as well as septal pacing is recommended for improvement of bidirectional conduction block. Normalization of primarily altered conduction and, therefore, recurrence of atrial flutter are high in all patients without bidirectional block.
咽鼓管峡部的双向传导阻滞可预测心房扑动消融的长期疗效。关于单向或不完全阻滞等轻微传导变化的发生率和结果的数据有限。这项前瞻性研究旨在系统评估完全传导阻滞之前双向传导的离散急性和长期改变。
对41例I型心房扑动患者,在每次连续射频(RF)应用后,记录并分析低位外侧和近端冠状窦起搏期间通过咽鼓管峡部的脉冲传播。对于传导特性改变且心房扑动不能诱发的患者,进行了12个月的随访。发现了三组结果。首先,RF应用后,23例患者在完全传导阻滞之前出现进行性传导延迟。其次,RF应用并不总是同时或以相同程度影响逆时针和顺时针传导。在13例患者中,逆时针传导的初始改变先于顺时针传导的改变;在5例患者中,顺时针传导主要受到影响。第三,完全双向传导阻滞患者的典型心房扑动复发率为9%(2/22),单向传导阻滞患者为54%(7/13),单纯双向传导延迟患者为100%(6/6)。
在50%的患者中,连续RF应用主要导致进行性传导延迟而非突然的传导阻滞。由于逆时针和顺时针传导并不总是同时或以相同程度受到影响,建议进行外侧和间隔起搏以改善双向传导阻滞。在所有无双向阻滞的患者中,主要改变的传导恢复正常以及因此心房扑动复发的发生率很高。