Venkatesh B, Morgan J, Jones R D, Clague A
Department of Intensive Care, Anaesthesiology and Chemical Pathology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Feb;26(1):46-50. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600106.
This laboratory-based bench study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy and equilibration characteristics of air and saline respectively as CO2 equilibrating media in the silicone balloon of a gastric tonometer and to compare two methods of measuring air PCO2. Two gastric tonometers were suspended in a bath containing 0.9% saline maintained at 37 degrees C. Certified calibration gases at three different CO2 concentrations were bubbled into the bath. When the bath PCO2 measurement was stable the tonometers were primed with 5 ml of air and 2.5 ml normal saline respectively and allowed to equilibrate for 30 and 90 minutes. Following equilibration, samples were aspirated and analysed in duplicate in a blood gas analyser. Bias and precision were calculated from the measured and expected PCO2 values. A consistent negative bias (21-23%) was seen with air at all three CO2 concentrations at 30 and 90 minutes with a coefficient of variation between 2.7 and 3.3%. Imprecise data were obtained with saline at different levels of CO2. A similar experimental set-up was used to compare air PCO2 measurement by a blood gas analyser and an infra-red analyser (Tonocap). Similar bias was obtained with the blood gas analyser with respect to air PCO2 measurement as in experiment 1. The infra-red analyser measurement was highly precise with negligible bias. Air appears to be a better CO2 equilibration medium during bench testing of tonometry producing a systematic negative offset and requiring a uniform correction factor of 1.25. This correction factor is independent of equilibration time and equilibrating CO2 concentration. The use of the infra-red analyser eliminates any bias in the measurement of air PCO2 and obviates the need for a correction factor.
本基于实验室的台架研究旨在分别评估空气和生理盐水作为胃张力计硅胶球囊中二氧化碳平衡介质的准确性和平衡特性,并比较两种测量空气PCO2的方法。将两个胃张力计悬挂在一个装有维持在37摄氏度的0.9%生理盐水的浴槽中。将三种不同二氧化碳浓度的经认证校准气体鼓泡通入浴槽中。当浴槽PCO2测量稳定后,分别用5毫升空气和2.5毫升生理盐水对张力计进行灌注,并使其平衡30分钟和90分钟。平衡后,抽取样本并在血气分析仪中进行一式两份分析。根据测量的和预期的PCO2值计算偏差和精密度。在30分钟和90分钟时,在所有三种二氧化碳浓度下,空气均出现一致的负偏差(21%-23%),变异系数在2.7%至3.3%之间。在不同二氧化碳水平下,用生理盐水获得的数据不精确。使用类似的实验装置比较血气分析仪和红外分析仪(Tonocap)对空气PCO2的测量。与实验1中空气PCO2测量相比,血气分析仪获得了类似的偏差。红外分析仪测量高度精确,偏差可忽略不计。在张力计的台架测试中,空气似乎是一种更好的二氧化碳平衡介质,会产生系统性负偏移,需要1.25的统一校正因子。该校正因子与平衡时间和平衡二氧化碳浓度无关。使用红外分析仪消除了空气PCO2测量中的任何偏差,无需校正因子。