Suppr超能文献

女性基于何种理由参与产前筛查?

On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?

作者信息

Santalahti P, Aro A R, Hemminki E, Helenius H, Ryynänen M

机构信息

National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 1998 Feb;18(2):153-65.

PMID:9516017
Abstract

Along with the rapid biomedical development of prenatal screening tests, target groups' attitudes and decision-making about, and the acceptance of, screening procedures have come into focus. To understand users' decision-making, it is essential to understand users' knowledge and perceptions of a procedure. The aim of this study was to examine Finnish women's knowledge and perceptions of, and stated reasons to participate in, two prenatal screening tests: serum screening and mid-trimester ultrasound screening. Subjects (n=1035) for the serum screening survey were catered for in the maternity care centres of two Finnish towns, where serum screening is available for all pregnant women. After one reminder, 88 per cent returned the questionnaire. Subjects (n=497) for the mid-trimester ultrasound screening survey were catered for in the obstetrical and gynaecological outpatient clinic of the city hospital of another town; the response rate was 85 per cent. Women's perceptions of the studied prenatal screening tests, serum screening and mid-trimester ultrasound screening, differed significantly, even though both are used to detect fetal malformations. Serum screening was far more often perceived to be connected with finding diseases or abnormalities than ultrasound screening. Another interesting finding was that the stated reasons for screening in general and the subjective reasons for participation were different. Reassurance was the personal reason most often mentioned in both the serum screening and the ultrasound group. Almost all women had the most superficial knowledge about serum screening; they knew whether it had been offered and that it is done to screen for Down syndrome. The greatest gaps in knowledge concerned the sensitivity of serum screening, its use in screening for congenital nephrosis, and diagnostic tests and their risks. Knowledge was poorer among women without a high school education. When counselling women about prenatal screening tests, more emphasis should be given to the sensitivity of serum screening, all of its screening uses, and the possible diagnostic tests and their risks. The fact that ultrasound screening can detect conditions which may lead to the possibility of a selective abortion should also be explained more fully.

摘要

随着产前筛查测试在生物医学领域的迅速发展,目标群体对筛查程序的态度、决策以及接受程度已成为关注焦点。为了解用户的决策过程,了解用户对某一程序的知识和认知至关重要。本研究的目的是调查芬兰女性对两种产前筛查测试的知识、认知以及参与筛查的既定理由,这两种筛查测试分别是血清筛查和孕中期超声筛查。血清筛查调查的对象(n = 1035)来自芬兰两个城镇的产妇护理中心,在那里所有孕妇都可进行血清筛查。经过一次提醒后,88%的人返回了问卷。孕中期超声筛查调查的对象(n = 497)来自另一个城镇市医院的妇产科门诊;回复率为85%。尽管血清筛查和孕中期超声筛查都用于检测胎儿畸形,但女性对这两种产前筛查测试的认知存在显著差异。血清筛查比超声筛查更常被认为与发现疾病或异常有关。另一个有趣的发现是,总体上筛查的既定理由与参与筛查的主观理由不同。在血清筛查组和超声筛查组中,安心是最常被提及的个人理由。几乎所有女性对血清筛查的了解都非常肤浅;她们知道是否提供了血清筛查以及其用于筛查唐氏综合征。知识方面最大的差距在于血清筛查的敏感性、其在先天性肾病筛查中的应用、诊断测试及其风险。未受过高中教育的女性知识水平较差。在为女性提供产前筛查测试咨询时,应更加强调血清筛查的敏感性、其所有筛查用途、可能的诊断测试及其风险。超声筛查能够检测出可能导致选择性堕胎的情况这一事实也应得到更充分的解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验