Suppr超能文献

生物多样性评估与保护策略

Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies.

作者信息

Freitag S, Chown SL, Muller C, Koch S, Hull H, Bellamy C, Kruger M, Endrody-Younga S, Mansell MW, Scholtz CH

机构信息

A. S. van Jaarsveld, S. Freitag, S. L. Chown, C. Muller, S. Kock, H. Hull, C. H. Scholtz, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. C. Bellamy, M. Kruger, S. Endrody-Younga, Transvaal Museum,

出版信息

Science. 1998 Mar 27;279(5359):2106-8. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5359.2106.

Abstract

The efficient representation of all species in conservation planning is problematic. Often, species distribution is assessed by dividing the land into a grid; complementary sets of grids, in which each taxon is represented at least once, are then sought. To determine if this approach provides useful surrogate information, species and higher taxon data for South African plants and animals were analyzed. Complementary species sets did not coincide and overlapped little with higher taxon sets. Survey extent and taxonomic knowledge did not affect this overlap. Thus, the assumptions of surrogacy, on which so much conservation planning is based, are not supported.

摘要

在保护规划中对所有物种进行有效表征是个难题。通常,通过将土地划分为网格来评估物种分布;然后寻找互补的网格集,其中每个分类单元至少有一次被代表。为了确定这种方法是否能提供有用的替代信息,对南非动植物的物种和高级分类单元数据进行了分析。互补物种集并不一致,且与高级分类单元集的重叠很少。调查范围和分类学知识并未影响这种重叠。因此,许多保护规划所基于的替代假设并不成立。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验