Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Mälkiä E, Kraemer W J, Newton R U, Alen M
Neuromuscular Research Center and Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, 40351 Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Apr;84(4):1341-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1341.
Effects of 6 mo of heavy-resistance training combined with explosive exercises on neural activation of the agonist and antagonist leg extensors, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris, as well as maximal and explosive strength were examined in 10 middle-aged men (M40; 42 +/- 2 yr), 11 middle-aged women (W40; 39 +/- 3 yr), 11 elderly men (M70; 72 +/- 3 yr) and 10 elderly women (W70; 67 +/- 3 yr). Maximal and explosive strength remained unaltered during a 1-mo control period with no strength training. After the 6 mo of training, maximal isometric and dynamic leg-extension strength increased by 36 +/- 4 and 22 +/- 2% (P < 0. 001) in M40, by 36 +/- 3 and 21 +/- 3% (P < 0.001) in M70, by 66 +/- 9 and 34 +/- 4% (P < 0.001) in W40, and by 57 +/- 10 and 30 +/- 3% (P < 0.001) in W70, respectively. All groups showed large increases (P < 0.05-0.001) in the maximum integrated EMGs (iEMGs) of the agonist vastus lateralis and medialis. Significant (P < 0.05-0.001) increases occurred in the maximal rate of isometric force production and in a squat jump that were accompanied with increased (P < 0.05-0. 01) iEMGs of the leg extensors. The iEMG of the antagonist biceps femoris muscle during the maximal isometric leg extension decreased in both M70 (from 24 +/- 6 to 21 +/- 6%; P < 0.05) and in W70 (from 31 +/- 9 to 24 +/- 4%; P < 0.05) to the same level as recorded for M40 and W40. The CSA of the quadriceps femoris increased in M40 by 5% (P < 0.05), in W40 by 9% (P < 0.01), in W70 by 6% (P < 0.05), and in M70 by 2% (not significant). Great training-induced gains in maximal and explosive strength in both middle-aged and elderly subjects were accompanied by large increases in the voluntary activation of the agonists, with significant reductions in the antagonist coactivation in the elderly subjects. Because the enlargements in the muscle CSAs in both middle-aged and elderly subjects were much smaller in magnitude, neural adaptations seem to play a greater role in explaining strength and power gains during the present strength-training protocol.
在10名中年男性(M40;42±2岁)、11名中年女性(W40;39±3岁)、11名老年男性(M70;72±3岁)和10名老年女性(W70;67±3岁)中,研究了6个月的重阻力训练结合爆发性练习对主动肌和拮抗肌腿部伸肌的神经激活、股四头肌的肌肉横截面积(CSA)以及最大力量和爆发力的影响。在为期1个月的无力量训练对照期内,最大力量和爆发力保持不变。经过6个月的训练,M40组的最大等长和动态腿部伸展力量分别增加了36±4%和22±2%(P<0.001),M70组增加了36±3%和21±3%(P<0.001),W40组增加了66±9%和34±4%(P<0.001),W70组增加了57±10%和30±3%(P<0.001)。所有组的主动肌外侧和内侧股直肌的最大积分肌电图(iEMG)均有大幅增加(P<0.05 - 0.001)。等长力量产生的最大速率和深蹲跳中有显著(P<0.05 - 0.001)增加,同时腿部伸肌的iEMG增加(P<0.05 - 0.01)。在最大等长腿部伸展过程中,拮抗肌股二头肌的iEMG在M70组(从24±6%降至21±6%;P<0.05)和W70组(从31±9%降至24±4%;P<0.05)均降至与M40组和W40组记录的相同水平。股四头肌的CSA在M40组增加了5%(P<0.05),在W40组增加了9%(P<0.01),在W70组增加了6%(P<0.05),在M70组增加了2%(无显著性差异)。中年和老年受试者在训练诱导的最大力量和爆发力方面有显著提高,同时主动肌的自主激活大幅增加,老年受试者的拮抗肌共激活显著降低。由于中年和老年受试者肌肉CSA的增大幅度要小得多,神经适应似乎在解释当前力量训练方案中力量和功率增加方面发挥了更大作用。