Lecce Edoardo, Romagnoli Ruggero, Frinolli Giorgio, Felici Francesco, Piacentini Maria Francesca, Bazzucchi Ilenia
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome 'Foro Italico', Rome, Italy.
Italian Weightlifting Federation' FIPE', Rome, Italy.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Feb;125(2):327-338. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05604-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
In the present study, we examined how a 4-week intervention of maximal intended velocity (MIVRT) and controlled velocity resistance training (CRT)-induced task-specific responses in expert individuals.
Twenty elite athletes were randomly assigned to either a MIVRT (n = 10) or CRT (n = 10) group, both following the same volume-load training based on the back-squat three times a week but with different intentions in moving load (force-exertion speed). We assessed one-repetition maximum (1RM), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean propulsive power (MPP) using a progressive-loading test before and after the intervention. A linear position transducer was used to monitor propulsive velocity in training and testing sessions.
Both groups significantly increased their 1RM (CRT: + 12.3%, p < 0.001, d = 0.39; MIVRT: + 12.5%, p < 0.001, d = 0.45). Only the MIVRT group showed a significant improvement in MPV (p < 0.01) across different stepping loads, while both groups improved in MPP (MIVRT: + 22.4%, p < 0.001, d = 0.54; CRT: + 8.1%, p = 0.04, d = 0.17).
MIVRT induced significant adaptations in MPV and MPP at various loads (%1RM), underlining its specificity in targeting these parameters. Despite similar enhancements in 1RM, the distinct training protocols suggest that strength gains may stem from either maximal intent in moving loads or longer times under tension. This study highlights the role of execution speed in optimizing power outcomes, emphasizing task specificity as paramount to elicit physiological adaptations in chronically strength-trained individuals.
在本研究中,我们考察了为期4周的最大预期速度(MIVRT)和控制速度阻力训练(CRT)干预如何在专业个体中引发特定任务的反应。
20名精英运动员被随机分为MIVRT组(n = 10)或CRT组(n = 10),两组均遵循相同的基于后蹲的每周三次的容量负荷训练,但在移动负荷(用力速度)方面有不同的意图。我们在干预前后使用渐进负荷测试评估了一次重复最大值(1RM)、平均推进速度(MPV)和平均推进功率(MPP)。在训练和测试过程中使用线性位置传感器监测推进速度。
两组的1RM均显著增加(CRT组:+12.3%,p < 0.001,d = 0.39;MIVRT组:+12.5%,p < 0.001,d = 0.45)。只有MIVRT组在不同的步幅负荷下MPV有显著改善(p < 0.01),而两组的MPP均有所提高(MIVRT组:+22.4%,p < 0.001,d = 0.54;CRT组:+8.1%,p = 0.04,d = 0.17)。
MIVRT在各种负荷(%1RM)下均能在MPV和MPP方面引发显著的适应性变化,突出了其针对这些参数的特异性。尽管两组在1RM上有相似的提高,但不同的训练方案表明力量的增加可能源于移动负荷时的最大意图或更长时间的张力作用。本研究强调了执行速度在优化功率输出方面的作用,强调任务特异性对于在长期力量训练个体中引发生理适应性变化至关重要。