Effects of extradural block: comparison of the properties, circulatory effects and pharmacokinetics of etidocaine and bupivacaine.

Five healthy, unmedicated male volunteers, aged 19-25 yr, participated in a double-blind, crossover study. Each subject received, on separate occasions and via a catheter placed at L2, 1.5% etiodocaine HCl20 ml with adrenaline 5 mug/ml, or 0.75% bupivacaine HCl 20 ml with adrenaline 5 mug/ml for extradural analgesia. In addition, in order to calculate the absorption rate of the local anaesthetic agent, each subject received on two further occasions etidocaine HCl 75 mg and bupivacaine HCl 75 mg respectively by i.v. infusion, over a period of 10 min. Spread of sensory analgesia to four segments above and below the site of injection was faster with etidocaine (13 +/- 3 min) (mean +/- SD) than with bupivacaine (22 +/- 8 min). Two-segment regression occurred later for bupivacaine (260 +/- 57 min) than for etidocaine (180 +/- 96 min). Caudal spread of analgesia was more extensive with etidocaine than with bupivacaine. The onset of motor blockade tended to be faster with etidocaine (5.8 +/- 3.0 min), than with bupivacaine (10.0 +/- 3.5 min); regression of motor blockade by one unit was longer with etidocaine (306 +/- 103 min) than bupivacaine (238 +/- 75 min). Sudomotor block occurred earlier with etidocaine (4.0 +/- 2.1 min) than bupivacaine (13.7 +/- 4.8 min). Significant changes in cardiac stroke work and stroke volume occurred. For etidocaine these measurements remained below control values for 120-210 min after injection. The mean maximum arterial plasma concentration of etidocaine was 1.52 +/- 0.64 mug/ml, at 14 +/- 2 min and of bupivacaine was 1.35 +/- 0.63 mug/ml, achieved at 20 +/- 4 min. The systemic absorption of both drugs occurred in a biphasic pattern with a fast and slow half-life of 0.3 and approximately 8 h respectively.