Weder J K, Telek L, Vozári-Hampe M, Saini H S
Institut für Lebensmittelchemie, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany.
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1997;51(2):85-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1007924931856.
Antinutritional factors of anasazi bean were compared to traditional pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Anasazi beans contained less (p<0.001) soluble and bound condensed tannins compared to pinto beans. No differences (p>0.05) in stachyose and raffinose content were found between the two bean types; verbascose was not detected at all. Significant (p<0.05) differences in lectin content were observed between anasazi and pinto bean. The lectins of anasazi beans were classified as non toxic and those of the pinto beans as toxic types. No differences (p>0.05) in inhibitor activity against human and bovine trypsin and chymotrypsin were found between the two bean types.
将阿纳萨齐豆的抗营养因子与传统的斑豆（菜豆属普通菜豆）进行了比较。与斑豆相比，阿纳萨齐豆所含的可溶性和结合态缩合单宁较少（p<0.001）。两种豆类之间水苏糖和棉子糖含量未发现差异（p>0.05）；完全未检测到毛蕊花糖。阿纳萨齐豆和斑豆之间的凝集素含量存在显著差异（p<0.05）。阿纳萨齐豆的凝集素被归类为无毒型，而斑豆的凝集素为有毒型。两种豆类对人及牛胰蛋白酶和胰凝乳蛋白酶的抑制活性未发现差异（p>0.05）。
