Shea K G, Stevens P M, Nelson M, Smith J T, Masters K S, Yandow S
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Mar 1;23(5):551-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00007.
A comparison between computer-assisted measurement using digitized radiographs, which has the potential to reduce error, and manual measurement using standard radiographs.
To assess measurement variability for the Cobb method on digital radiographs and compare it with that of manual measurements on standard radiographs.
Studies of the Cobb method have demonstrated multiple sources of error leading to significant intraobserver measurement variability. Estimates for the 95% confidence interval for intraobserver variability range from 2.8 degrees to 10 degrees.
Twenty-four scoliosis radiographs were measured by six examiners. Two measurement sets were done manually ("manual set"), and two measurement sets were done on digitized images using a computer mouse ("computer set").
For the manual set, the 95% confidence interval for intraobserver variability was 3.3 degrees (range, 2.5-4.5 degrees). For the computer set, the value was 2.6 degrees (range, 2.3-3.3 degrees). This difference in 95% confidence intervals between the manual and computer sets was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
The results of this study demonstrate that intraobserver variability for manual and computer Cobb angle measurements yield a 95% confidence interval of approximately 3 degrees, with the computer having a slightly lower variability. The computer technique removes sources of intrinsic error, e.g., the variability introduced by using different manual protractors, the inaccuracy of standard protractors, and the use of wide-diameter radiographic markers. Identical digital images can be shared electronically between centers, without having to duplicate and mail films. Multicenter studies in which different examiners will be measuring Cobb angles may consider using the computer as a measuring device to reduce intrinsic measurement errors.
比较使用数字化X线片进行计算机辅助测量(有可能减少误差)与使用标准X线片进行手动测量。
评估数字X线片上Cobb法测量的变异性,并将其与标准X线片上的手动测量变异性进行比较。
对Cobb法的研究表明存在多种误差来源,导致观察者内测量变异性显著。观察者内变异性的95%置信区间估计范围为2.8度至10度。
6名检查者对24张脊柱侧弯X线片进行测量。进行两组手动测量(“手动组”),两组在数字化图像上使用计算机鼠标进行测量(“计算机组”)。
对于手动组,观察者内变异性的95%置信区间为3.3度(范围为2.5 - 4.5度)。对于计算机组,该值为2.6度(范围为2.3 - 3.3度)。手动组和计算机组之间95%置信区间的这种差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。
本研究结果表明,手动和计算机Cobb角测量的观察者内变异性产生的95%置信区间约为3度,计算机的变异性略低。计算机技术消除了内在误差来源,例如使用不同手动量角器引入的变异性、标准量角器的不准确性以及使用大直径X线标记物。相同的数字图像可以在各中心之间以电子方式共享,而无需复制和邮寄胶片。在不同检查者将测量Cobb角的多中心研究中,可能会考虑使用计算机作为测量设备以减少内在测量误差。