• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类对丙酸的反应。I. 正常嗅觉者和嗅觉缺失者对丙酸感知的个体内和个体间差异的量化

Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.

作者信息

Kendal-Reed M, Walker J C, Morgan W T, LaMacchio M, Lutz R W

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 1998 Feb;23(1):71-82. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.71.

DOI:10.1093/chemse/23.1.71
PMID:9530972
Abstract

The objective of this study was to fully characterize normosmic perception of stimuli expected to cause widely varying degrees of olfactory and nasal trigeminal stimulation and to directly evaluate the possible role of olfactory nerve stimulation in nasal irritation sensitivity. During each of four identical test sessions, four anosmic and 31 normosmic participants were presented with a range of concentrations extending from peri-threshold for normosmics to supra-threshold for anosmics. For each session, odor (O) and nasal irritation (NI) sensitivities were summarized in terms of the concentrations required to produce four sensation levels ('iso-response' concentrations). Within-participant variation in these iso-response concentrations was < 10-fold for 95% of normosmics, for both O and NI. For O but not NI, these apparent fluctuations in sensitivity were largely accounted for by the uncertainty surrounding the iso-response concentrations calculated for each session. Anosmics exhibited minimal within- and between-participant variation in NI and required, for all but the highest perceptual level, a higher concentration than almost all normosmics. Between-participant variation, expressed in terms of 90% confidence interval widths, was approximately 0.5 log units for both O and NI for the highest perceptual level, but increased to approximately 0.8 and 1.8 log units, respectively, for the lowest (peri-threshold) level. Our findings suggest that: (i) most apparent variation over time in O sensitivity is actually a reflection of the uncertainty surrounding estimates of sensitivity obtained for each session; (ii) within- and between-participant variation in O sensitivity is far less than is commonly reported; and (iii) low to moderate levels of NI in normosmics are the result of relatively weak trigeminal stimulation combined with much greater olfactory activation.

摘要

本研究的目的是全面描述对预期会引起广泛不同程度嗅觉和鼻三叉神经刺激的刺激的正常嗅觉感知,并直接评估嗅觉神经刺激在鼻刺激敏感性中的可能作用。在四个相同的测试环节中,分别向4名嗅觉缺失者和31名嗅觉正常者呈现一系列浓度范围,从嗅觉正常者的阈下浓度到嗅觉缺失者的阈上浓度。对于每个环节,根据产生四种感觉水平(“等反应”浓度)所需的浓度来总结气味(O)和鼻刺激(NI)敏感性。对于95%的嗅觉正常者,O和NI的这些等反应浓度的个体内变异均<10倍。对于O而非NI,这些明显的敏感性波动在很大程度上是由每个环节计算的等反应浓度周围的不确定性所导致的。嗅觉缺失者在NI方面表现出最小的个体内和个体间变异,除了最高感知水平外,几乎所有嗅觉正常者所需的浓度都比他们高。对于最高感知水平,以90%置信区间宽度表示的个体间变异,O和NI均约为0.5对数单位,但对于最低(阈下)水平,分别增加到约0.8和1.8对数单位。我们的研究结果表明:(i)O敏感性随时间的最明显变化实际上反映了每个环节获得的敏感性估计周围的不确定性;(ii)O敏感性的个体内和个体间变异远小于通常报道的情况;(iii)嗅觉正常者中低至中等水平的NI是相对较弱的三叉神经刺激与更强的嗅觉激活相结合的结果。

相似文献

1
Human responses to propionic acid. I. Quantification of within- and between-participant variation in perception by normosmics and anosmics.人类对丙酸的反应。I. 正常嗅觉者和嗅觉缺失者对丙酸感知的个体内和个体间差异的量化
Chem Senses. 1998 Feb;23(1):71-82. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.71.
2
Investigating sources of response variability and neural mediation in human nasal irritation.
Indoor Air. 2001 Sep;11(3):185-91. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011003185.x.
3
Human responses to propionic acid. II. Quantification of breathing responses and their relationship to perception.
Chem Senses. 2001 May;26(4):351-8. doi: 10.1093/chemse/26.4.351.
4
Trigeminal and olfactory sensitivity: comparison of modalities and methods of measurement.三叉神经与嗅觉敏感性:测量方式与方法的比较
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Mar;71(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s004200050256.
5
Thresholds for odor and nasal pungency.气味和鼻腔刺激性阈值。
Physiol Behav. 1990 Nov;48(5):719-25. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90217-r.
6
Psychometric functions for the olfactory and trigeminal detectability of butyl acetate and toluene.乙酸丁酯和甲苯的嗅觉及三叉神经检测能力的心理测量函数。
J Appl Toxicol. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):25-30. doi: 10.1002/jat.822.
7
Sensory properties of selected terpenes. Thresholds for odor, nasal pungency, nasal localization, and eye irritation.所选萜类化合物的感官特性。气味、鼻腔刺激性、鼻腔定位和眼睛刺激性的阈值。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:648-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10640.x.
8
Sensory reactions of nasal pungency and odor to volatile organic compounds: the alkylbenzenes.鼻腔对挥发性有机化合物(烷基苯)的辛辣和气味的感官反应。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994 Sep;55(9):811-7. doi: 10.1080/15428119491018529.
9
Efficacy of volatile organic compounds in evoking nasal pungency and odor.挥发性有机化合物诱发鼻腔刺激感和气味的功效。
Arch Environ Health. 1993 Sep-Oct;48(5):309-14. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9936719.
10
Identifying normosmics: a comparison of two populations.识别等渗者:两个人群的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 1986 May-Jun;7(3):194-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(86)80006-0.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Apr;66(4):460-475. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03672-w.
2
Dynamics of nasal irritation from pulsed homologous alcohols.脉冲同源醇引起的鼻刺激动力学。
Chem Senses. 2010 Nov;35(9):823-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq086. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
3
Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.嗅觉中的嗅吸与时空编码
Chem Senses. 2006 Feb;31(2):119-30. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjj013. Epub 2005 Dec 14.
4
Setting occupational exposure limits in humans: contributions from the field of experimental psychology.设定人类职业接触限值:实验心理学领域的贡献。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Apr;79(4):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0053-8. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
5
Olfactory impairments in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions are selective to inputs from the contralesional nostril.单侧小脑病变患者的嗅觉障碍对来自对侧鼻孔的输入具有选择性。
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 6;25(27):6362-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0920-05.2005.
6
Human breathing and eye blink rate responses to airborne chemicals.人类对空气中化学物质的呼吸和眨眼频率反应。
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):507-12. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s4507.
7
Odorant-induced and sniff-induced activation in the cerebellum of the human.人类小脑中气味诱导和嗅觉诱导的激活。
J Neurosci. 1998 Nov 1;18(21):8990-9001. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-21-08990.1998.