Klein E E, Gerber R, Zhu X R, Oehmke F, Purdy J A
Radiation Oncology Center, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Mar 1;40(4):977-85. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00916-4.
After acquiring 4 years of experience with Dynamic Wedge, a software-driven one-dimensional (1D) compensation system, we implemented a new software version called Enhanced Dynamic Wedge (EDW). The EDW allows larger (30 cm) and asymmetric field sizes and additional angles for wedged fields. We implemented this software on four similar dual-energy accelerators that also possess upper and lower physical wedge sets. Our goal was to implement EDW with one common wedge factor (WF) table and one set of treatment-planning files.
We measured WFs with an ionization chamber and isodose profiles with both film and a diode array. We used a calculation scheme that requires only entry of the wedge angle and fixed jaw value. Filters for computerized treatment planning were configured for each wedge angle. We also examined to what degree the multileaf collimation (MLC) orientation, which is orthogonal to the EDW direction, was compromised for specific treatment sites. As a comparative test, we examined the dosimetric consistency for the 8 sets of physical wedges on the four machines. Finally, we updated our DW quality assurance program for EDW.
The measured EDW WF was common for all four machines to within +/- 1.5% and the calculation scheme held to within 1.5%. The EDW isodoses were consistent among the machines as measured by film and diode array. The treatment-planning filters provided computed isodose profiles that were nearly identical to measured profiles. Regarding MLC orientation, we found that the collimator angle needed for EDW did not compromise isodose distributions, as apparent in measured isodoses and calculated dose-volume histograms. The consistency of the physical wedges did not fare as well. Two of the lower wedge sets had Wfs and profiles different (> 3%) from the other wedge sets.
We have successfully implemented EDW on four machines using only one WF table and one set of treatment-planning filters. The EDW provides for improved treatment techniques for particular sites due to the large field sizes and additional angles available. Daily treatment efficiency has increased because of the remote capability provided by EDW.
在积累了4年使用动态楔形板(一种软件驱动的一维(1D)补偿系统)的经验后,我们实施了一个名为增强动态楔形板(EDW)的新软件版本。EDW允许更大(30厘米)和不对称的射野尺寸以及楔形野的更多角度。我们在四台类似的双能加速器上实施了该软件,这些加速器也配备了上下物理楔形板组。我们的目标是用一个通用的楔形因子(WF)表和一组治疗计划文件来实施EDW。
我们用离子室测量了WF,并使用胶片和二极管阵列测量了等剂量曲线。我们使用了一种仅需输入楔形角和固定准直器值的计算方案。针对每个楔形角配置了计算机化治疗计划的滤波器。我们还研究了与EDW方向正交的多叶准直器(MLC)方向在何种程度上会因特定治疗部位而受到影响。作为一项对比测试,我们检查了四台机器上8套物理楔形板的剂量学一致性。最后,我们更新了针对EDW的DW质量保证程序。
四台机器测得的EDW WF在±1.5%范围内是通用的,计算方案的误差在1.5%以内。通过胶片和二极管阵列测量,各机器之间的EDW等剂量曲线是一致的。治疗计划滤波器提供的计算等剂量曲线与测量曲线几乎相同。关于MLC方向,我们发现EDW所需的准直器角度并未影响等剂量分布,这在测量的等剂量曲线和计算的剂量体积直方图中很明显。物理楔形板的一致性则没那么好。两组下部楔形板的WF和曲线与其他楔形板组不同(>3%)。
我们仅使用一个WF表和一组治疗计划滤波器就在四台机器上成功实施了EDW。由于可用的大射野尺寸和更多角度,EDW为特定部位提供了改进的治疗技术。由于EDW提供的远程功能,日常治疗效率有所提高。