Mishara B L, Daigle M S
Center for Research and Intervention on Suicide and Euthanasia, Université du Quebec à Montréal, Canada.
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Dec;25(6):861-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1022269314076.
To determine the relative effectiveness of telephone intervention styles with suicidal callers, researchers listened unobtrusively to 617 calls by suicidal persons at two suicide prevention centers and categorized all 66,953 responses by the 110 volunteer helpers according to a reliable 20-category checklist. Outcome measures showed observer evaluations of decreased depressive mood from the beginning to the end in 14% of calls, decreased suicidal urgency ratings from the beginning to the end in 27% of calls, and reaching a contract in 68% of calls, of which 54% of contracts were upheld according to follow-up data. Within the context of relatively directive interventions, a greater proportion of "Rogerian" nondirective responses was related to significantly more decreases in depression. Reduction in urgency and reaching a contract were related to greater use of Rogerian response categories only with nonchronic callers.
为了确定针对有自杀倾向来电者的电话干预方式的相对有效性,研究人员在两个自杀预防中心暗中监听了617通有自杀倾向者的来电,并根据一份可靠的20类清单,对110名志愿者协助者的所有66953条回复进行了分类。结果指标显示,观察者评估在14%的通话中,来电者的抑郁情绪从开始到结束有所减轻;在27%的通话中,自杀紧迫性评分从开始到结束有所降低;在68%的通话中达成了协议,根据后续数据,其中54%的协议得到了遵守。在相对指导性干预的背景下,更大比例的“罗杰斯式”非指导性回复与抑郁情绪的显著更多减轻相关。紧迫性的降低和协议的达成仅与非慢性来电者更多使用罗杰斯式回复类别有关。