Singh N N, Ellis C R, Wechsler H
Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 1997;7(4):255-66. doi: 10.1089/cap.1997.7.255.
We present a brief historical overview of the prevalence studies of psychotropic drugs in individuals with mental retardation that were published between 1966 and 1985, and a more comprehensive review of the prevalence studies from 1986 to 1995. During the 1966 to 1985 period, typical prevalence rates of drug treatments in institutions (children and adults analyzed together) were found to range from 30% to 40% for psychotropic drugs, 25% to 45% for anticonvulsants, and 50% to 70% for psychotropic and/or anticonvulsant drugs (i.e., psychotropics, anticonvulsants, or their combinations). In the community during the same period, prevalence rates in children were typically 2% to 7% for psychotropics, 12% to 31% for anticonvulsants, and 18% to 33% for psychotropic and/or anticonvulsant drugs. For adults in the community, prevalence rates ranged from 26% to 36% for psychotropics, 18% to 24% for anticonvulsants, and 36% to 48% for psychotropic and/or anticonvulsant drugs. In contrast, during the 1986 to 1995 period, typical prevalence rates in institutions ranged from 12% to 40% for psychotropics, 24% to 41% for anticonvulsants, and 44% to 60% for psychotropic and/or anticonvulsant drugs. In the same period, the prevalence rates in the community (for adults and children analyzed together) ranged from 19% to 29% for psychotropics, 18% to 23% for anticonvulsants, and 35% to 45% for psychotropic and/or anticonvulsant drugs. An analysis of the patterns of medication use showed that patient demographic, physical, social, behavioral, and psychiatric variables, as well as a number of staff variables, were correlated with use of pharmacotherapy in the entire population of individuals with mental retardation. A substantial number of individuals with mental retardation appeared to be prescribed psychotropic medications that may have been inappropriate for their diagnosis.
我们简要回顾了1966年至1985年间发表的关于智力障碍者使用精神药物的患病率研究的历史概况,并对1986年至1995年的患病率研究进行了更全面的综述。在1966年至1985年期间,机构中(儿童和成人合并分析)药物治疗的典型患病率为:精神药物为30%至40%,抗惊厥药物为25%至45%,精神药物和/或抗惊厥药物(即精神药物、抗惊厥药物或其组合)为50%至70%。在同一时期的社区中,儿童精神药物的患病率通常为2%至7%,抗惊厥药物为12%至31%,精神药物和/或抗惊厥药物为18%至33%。对于社区中的成年人,精神药物的患病率为26%至36%,抗惊厥药物为18%至24%,精神药物和/或抗惊厥药物为36%至48%。相比之下,在1986年至1995年期间,机构中精神药物的典型患病率为12%至40%,抗惊厥药物为24%至41%,精神药物和/或抗惊厥药物为44%至60%。在同一时期,社区中(成人和儿童合并分析)精神药物的患病率为19%至29%,抗惊厥药物为18%至23%,精神药物和/或抗惊厥药物为35%至45%。对用药模式的分析表明,患者的人口统计学、身体、社会、行为和精神变量,以及一些工作人员变量,与智力障碍者总体人群中药物治疗的使用相关。大量智力障碍者似乎被开了可能与其诊断不相符的精神药物。