Menzies D, Pasztor J, Nunes F, Leduc J, Chan C H
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arch Environ Health. 1997 Sep-Oct;52(5):360-7. doi: 10.1080/00039899709602212.
Sick building syndrome is the term given to a heterogeneous constellation of symptoms that affects workers in modern mechanically ventilated office buildings. Although the cause is unknown, there is evidence that the local environment of the work station is an important determinant of symptoms. In this study, investigators examined the effect of a new, individually controlled ventilation system on workers' symptoms. Investigators studied two groups of workers in one mechanically ventilated office building: (1) a control group at whose worksite no intervention was made and (2) an intervention group. The intervention consisted of installation of a device that allowed each worker control over the ventilation supplied to his or her worksite. Just before, and 4 and 16 mo after installation of this device, workers completed self-administered questionnaires regarding occurrence of symptoms. The new ventilation system resulted in higher air velocities, more variable temperatures, and higher concentrations of airborne dust and fungal spores. Four months after installation, workers with the new ventilation system reported fewer symptoms that were (a) work-related (p < .05) and that were work-related and frequent (p < .05); in addition, they reported fewer symptoms that reduced their capacity to work (p < .01). Sixteen months after installation, workers with the new device reported fewer symptoms than at baseline (although not as significantly), and they indicated that the indoor air quality improved their productivity by 11%, compared with a 4% reduction of productivity among the control group of workers (p < .001). Investigators concluded that the new ventilation system, which provided the workers with individual control over ventilation, was associated with important and sustained reduction in symptoms.
病态建筑综合征是一个用来描述影响现代机械通风办公大楼内工作人员的一系列不同症状的术语。尽管病因不明,但有证据表明工作场所的局部环境是症状的一个重要决定因素。在这项研究中,研究人员考察了一种新型的、可单独控制的通风系统对工作人员症状的影响。研究人员在一座机械通风的办公大楼里研究了两组工作人员:(1)一个对照组,其工作地点未进行干预;(2)一个干预组。干预措施包括安装一种装置,使每个工作人员能够控制供应到其工作地点的通风。就在安装该装置之前,以及安装后的4个月和16个月,工作人员完成了关于症状发生情况的自我管理问卷。新的通风系统导致了更高的风速、更易变的温度以及空气中灰尘和真菌孢子的浓度升高。安装后4个月,使用新通风系统的工作人员报告的与工作相关的症状较少(p < 0.05),以及与工作相关且频繁出现的症状较少(p < 0.05);此外,他们报告的降低工作能力的症状也较少(p < 0.01)。安装后16个月,使用新装置的工作人员报告的症状比基线时少(尽管不那么显著),并且他们表示室内空气质量使他们的生产力提高了11%,相比之下,对照组工作人员的生产力下降了4%(p < 0.001)。研究人员得出结论,为工作人员提供对通风的个人控制的新通风系统与症状的重要且持续减少有关。