DeVille K A, Kopelman L M
Department of Medical Humanities, School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Mar;25(1):237-54. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70367-3.
Pregnant women who abuse drugs, such as alcohol, cocaine, and marihuana may face a variety of legal and social responses, including involuntary commitment, forced treatment, and criminal sanctions. These programs are intended to remedy apparent maternal-fetal conflicts but paradoxically may encourage some women to avoid beneficial medical and social services or to seek abortion. Although pregnant women have ethical duties to give due consideration to their offspring, these moral obligations fail to justify coercive and punitive programs regarding substance abuse. Coercive fetal protection policies may undermine pregnant women's trust and cooperation, violate their autonomy, weaken our civil liberties, and raise a host of ethical problems relating to race, gender, and class prejudice. Education and drug treatment programs, rather than punitive and coercive measures, may better help pregnant women fulfill their moral duties to refrain from abusing substances.
滥用酒精、可卡因和大麻等毒品的孕妇可能会面临各种法律和社会回应,包括非自愿住院、强制治疗和刑事制裁。这些举措旨在解决明显的母婴冲突,但自相矛盾的是,可能会促使一些女性避开有益的医疗和社会服务,或者寻求堕胎。虽然孕妇有道义上的责任适当考虑其后代,但这些道德义务并不能成为针对药物滥用采取强制和惩罚性举措的正当理由。强制性的胎儿保护政策可能会破坏孕妇的信任与合作,侵犯她们的自主权,削弱我们的公民自由,并引发一系列与种族、性别和阶级偏见相关的伦理问题。教育和戒毒项目,而非惩罚性和强制性措施,可能更有助于孕妇履行其不滥用药物的道德责任。