Kennedy D M, Johnson A B, Hill P G
Department of Biochemistry, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, Derby, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1998 Mar;35 ( Pt 2):283-9. doi: 10.1177/000456329803500214.
Two automated methods for measuring fructosamine (Test Plus and the original fructosamine assay) and glycated haemoglobin (Tina-quant immunoassay) were compared to determine which is the best index of blood glucose control during pregnancy. Thirteen women with type 1 diabetes were studied, with four-weekly measurements of HbA1c and fructosamine Test Plus using a Hitachi 911 analyser and fructosamine measured using an Olympus AU800 analyser. HbA1c correlated better (r = 0.573) with mean blood glucose (MBG) concentration than did fructosamine Test Plus (r = 0.347), even after correction for total protein concentration (r = 0.463), while there was no significant correlation with the original fructosamine method (r = 0.201). HbA1c correlated better with fasting/pre-prandial MBG concentrations, whereas fructosamine Test Plus correlated better with post-prandial MBG concentrations. Fructosamine Test Plus decreased with gestational age, and correlated with albumin and total protein concentrations, whereas HbA1c did not change with gestational age. Thus, HbA1c and fructosamine Test Plus were found to be useful in verifying home blood glucose measurements in diabetic pregnancy, with HbA1c being the best predictor of MBG concentration.
比较了两种测量果糖胺的自动化方法(Test Plus和原始果糖胺测定法)以及糖化血红蛋白(Tina-quant免疫测定法),以确定哪一种是孕期血糖控制的最佳指标。对13名1型糖尿病女性进行了研究,使用日立911分析仪每四周测量一次HbA1c和果糖胺Test Plus,使用奥林巴斯AU800分析仪测量果糖胺。即使在校正总蛋白浓度后,HbA1c与平均血糖(MBG)浓度的相关性(r = 0.573)也比果糖胺Test Plus更好(r = 0.347),而与原始果糖胺方法无显著相关性(r = 0.201)。HbA1c与空腹/餐前MBG浓度的相关性更好,而果糖胺Test Plus与餐后MBG浓度的相关性更好。果糖胺Test Plus随孕周增加而降低,并与白蛋白和总蛋白浓度相关,而HbA1c不随孕周变化。因此,发现HbA1c和果糖胺Test Plus在验证糖尿病妊娠的家庭血糖测量中有用,HbA1c是MBG浓度的最佳预测指标。