Rezasoltani A, Kallinen M, Mälkiä E, Vihko V
LIKES-Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Feb;12(1):36-44. doi: 10.1191/026921598673972662.
To examine the reliability of measurements of semispinalis capitis muscle (SECM) cross-sectional area (CSA) in prone and sitting positions, and to compare the muscle size in these two positions.
Semispinalis capitis CSA was measured twice a day on two successive days with a real-time ultrasound apparatus.
Eighteen males (aged 19-34 years) and 28 females (aged 19-34 years) were studied for the reliability test. Seven males and 12 females were randomly selected to compare SECM size in sitting and prone positions.
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for repeatability measurements was r = 0.98 for the two positions. The correlation of the CSA in sitting and in prone positions was r = 0.93 (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between CSA, linear dimensions and shape ratio of SECM in the two positions.
In this study SECM ultrasonography appeared to be an accurate method in both positions, and position as such had no significant effects on the SECM cross-sectional size. Such accuracy allows neck muscle evaluation in clinical diagnosis and in follow-up studies during neck rehabilitation programmes.
研究俯卧位和坐位时头半棘肌(SECM)横截面积(CSA)测量的可靠性,并比较这两个体位下该肌肉的大小。
使用实时超声设备在连续两天内每天对SECM的CSA测量两次。
18名男性(年龄19 - 34岁)和28名女性(年龄19 - 34岁)参与可靠性测试。随机选取7名男性和12名女性比较坐位和俯卧位时SECM的大小。
两个体位重复性测量的组内相关系数(ICC)为r = 0.98。坐位和俯卧位时CSA的相关性为r = 0.93(p < 0.01)。两个体位下SECM的CSA、线性尺寸和形状比之间无显著差异。
在本研究中,SECM超声检查在两个体位下似乎都是一种准确的方法,体位本身对SECM横截面积大小无显著影响。这种准确性使得在临床诊断和颈部康复计划的随访研究中能够对颈部肌肉进行评估。