Achem S R, Robinson M
Division of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.
Dig Dis. 1998 Jan-Feb;16(1):38-46. doi: 10.1159/000016847.
Currently available medications for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) vary in mechanisms of action from neutralization or suppression of gastric acid to improving underlying upper gastrointestinal dysmotility. This article reviews the clinical efficacy of pharmacological agents used to treat GERD and provides a rationale for considering a primary prokinetic approach to antireflux treatment which will be applicable to many patients. Treatment trials in acute GERD have demonstrated unexpectedly prolonged maintenance of high esophageal pH with tablet and liquid antacid formulations. However, there are no well-designed placebo-controlled trials of antacids for esophageal mucosal healing. H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) at conventional doses relieve reflux symptoms in at least 50% of reported series of GERD patients, and they can also provide endoscopic healing in 27-45% of the cases. Therapy with more potent acid-suppressive agents such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may lead to improved symptomatic relief and to superior healing compared with H2RA therapy, especially in those patients with more advanced erosive esophagitis. Promotility agents, particularly cisapride, offer symptom relief and healing rates which are quite similar to standard H2RA treatment. GERD tends to be a chronic and relapsing condition. Cisapride has been shown to be quite effective in maintaining remission in GERD patients, including endoscopic remission in the lesser degrees of esophagitis. This may be accomplished with relatively low and cost-effective dosing in many individuals. For the small proportion of patients who manifest severe grades of esophagitis, PPI therapy is associated with lower relapse rates than either H2RA or prokinetic treatment. Overall, a strong case can be made for the empirical selection of promotility therapy for the large numbers of GERD patients who do not have documented severe erosive disease.
目前可用于治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的药物,其作用机制各不相同,从中和或抑制胃酸到改善潜在的上消化道动力障碍。本文回顾了用于治疗GERD的药物的临床疗效,并为考虑采用主要的促动力方法进行抗反流治疗提供了理论依据,这将适用于许多患者。急性GERD的治疗试验表明,片剂和液体抗酸剂制剂可意外地延长食管高pH值的维持时间。然而,尚无设计良好的抗酸剂治疗食管黏膜愈合的安慰剂对照试验。常规剂量的H2受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)在至少50%的GERD患者报告系列中可缓解反流症状,并且在27%-45%的病例中还可实现内镜下愈合。与H2RA治疗相比,使用更有效的抑酸剂如质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)进行治疗可能会带来更好的症状缓解和更高的愈合率,尤其是在那些患有更严重糜烂性食管炎的患者中。促动力剂,特别是西沙必利,其症状缓解率和愈合率与标准H2RA治疗相当。GERD往往是一种慢性复发性疾病。西沙必利已被证明在维持GERD患者的缓解方面非常有效,包括在较轻程度食管炎中的内镜缓解。在许多个体中,通过相对较低且经济有效的剂量即可实现这一点。对于表现出严重程度食管炎的一小部分患者,PPI治疗的复发率低于H2RA或促动力治疗。总体而言,对于大量没有记录到严重糜烂性疾病的GERD患者,经验性选择促动力治疗有充分的理由。