Suppr超能文献

伦理委员会对健康研究的监督。

Monitoring of health research by ethics committees.

作者信息

Douglass A J, Jarvis A, Bloore S

机构信息

Wellington School of Medicine.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1998 Mar 13;111(1061):79-81.

PMID:9549558
Abstract

AIMS

All health related research carried out within New Zealand requires appraisal from an accredited ethics committee. The purpose of this project was to pilot an active monitoring programme and to assess the effectiveness of such a programme for future monitoring by ethics committees.

METHODS

In this qualitative study interviews were undertaken by representatives from the Wellington and Manawatu-Whanganui ethics committees with principal investigators for sixteen research proposals which had been given ethical approval from the appropriate ethics committee. Issues discussed during the interviews included the protocol and any changes to the methods or research personnel, recruitment of participants, issues arising from informed consent, reporting of adverse events, funding and payment to researchers. Researchers were given the opportunity to provide feedback on the ethical review process and suggestions for improvement.

RESULTS

The most significant deviation from the approved protocol concerned access to patient information. Some minor discrepancies between the approved protocols and subsequent research undertaken and the requirements for extending ethical approval of projects beyond the initial approval date were also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The monitoring programme fulfilled an educational role, providing an opportunity for information sharing between ethics committees and researchers. An active monitoring programme by an ethics committee can detect deviations from the approved protocol beyond the current requirements for researchers to provide annual progress reports. Future monitoring should include, where relevant, access to consent forms and patients' notes.

摘要

目的

在新西兰境内开展的所有与健康相关的研究都需要经过经认可的伦理委员会评估。本项目的目的是试行一项主动监测计划,并评估该计划对伦理委员会未来监测的有效性。

方法

在这项定性研究中,惠灵顿和马纳瓦图 - 旺阿努伊伦理委员会的代表对16项已获得相应伦理委员会伦理批准的研究提案的主要研究者进行了访谈。访谈中讨论的问题包括研究方案以及方法或研究人员的任何变更、参与者的招募、知情同意引发的问题、不良事件的报告、资金以及向研究人员的付款。研究人员有机会对伦理审查过程提供反馈并提出改进建议。

结果

与获批研究方案最显著的偏差涉及获取患者信息。还讨论了获批方案与后续开展的研究之间的一些小差异,以及将项目伦理批准期限延长至初始批准日期之后的要求。

结论

监测计划发挥了教育作用,为伦理委员会和研究人员之间的信息共享提供了机会。伦理委员会的主动监测计划能够发现超出研究人员当前每年提供进展报告要求的获批方案偏差。未来的监测在相关情况下应包括获取知情同意书和患者病历。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验