Laitinen J
Kuopio Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Finland.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Mar;71(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s004200050258.
The Finnish occupational exposure limit (OEL) values for alkoxyethanols and their acetates were lowered in 1996. A reevaluation of the correspondence between the new OEL value and the biological action level (BAL) was thus needed. This study was conducted in silkscreen printing enterprises, where 2-alkoxyethanols and their acetates are mainly used as solvents. The air/urine correlations between 2-methoxyethylacetate, 2-ethoxyethylacetate, 2-butoxyethanol, 2-butoxyethylacetate, and 2-methoxyacetic (MAA), 2-ethoxyacetic (EAA), and 2-butoxyacetic acid (BAA) were evaluated on an individual and time-related basis at four different enterprises.
Inhalation exposure to alkoxyalcohols and their acetates was monitored with diffusion badges (n = 38) for an entire work week. Urinary excretion of alkoxyacetic acids immediatley after the shift and at 14-16 h after exposure (n = 112) was analyzed by a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame-ionization detector.
Inhalation exposure to 2-methoxyethylacetate at 0.5 cm3/m3 corresponded to MAA excretion of 3 mmol/mol creatinine in urine at 14 to 16 hours after exposure. The next-morning urinary EAA excretion of 37 mmol/mol creatinine corresponded to an 8-h 2-ethoxyethylacetate exposure of 2 cm3/m3 when all collected data were included. This average EAA excretion was 69% of the German BAT value and only 34% of the American biological exposure index (BEI) value. Urinary EAA excretion was 30-40% lower at the beginning of the work week than at the end of the work week. On the other hand, EAA excretion was 10-20% higher than that measured at 14-16 h after exposure. Urinary BAA excretion of 75 mmol/mol creatinine in postshift urine corresponded to an 8-h 2-butoxyethanol and 2-butoxyethylacetate exposure of 5 cm3/m3. This BAA excretion was 87% of the German BAT value.
According to these results, it seems that the BAL for MAA and EAA should be 3 and 50 mmol/mol creatinine as measured at 14-16 h after exposure, respectively. The BAL value for BAA seems to be 70 mmol/mol creatinine in postshift samples. These recommendations are valid only if samples are collected at the end of the work week.
1996年芬兰降低了烷氧基乙醇及其醋酸酯的职业接触限值(OEL)。因此需要重新评估新的OEL值与生物作用水平(BAL)之间的对应关系。本研究在丝网印刷企业中进行,这些企业主要使用2 - 烷氧基乙醇及其醋酸酯作为溶剂。在四家不同企业中,对个体和时间相关的2 - 甲氧基乙酸乙酯、2 - 乙氧基乙酸乙酯、2 - 丁氧基乙醇、2 - 丁氧基乙酸乙酯与2 - 甲氧基乙酸(MAA)、2 - 乙氧基乙酸(EAA)和2 - 丁氧基乙酸(BAA)的空气/尿液相关性进行了评估。
使用扩散式徽章(n = 38)对整个工作周的烷氧基醇及其醋酸酯的吸入暴露进行监测。通过配备火焰离子化检测器的气相色谱仪分析轮班后即刻以及暴露后14 - 16小时的尿中烷氧基乙酸的排泄情况(n = 112)。
暴露后14至16小时,吸入0.5 cm³/m³的2 - 甲氧基乙酸乙酯对应尿中MAA排泄量为3 mmol/mol肌酐。当纳入所有收集的数据时,次日晨尿中EAA排泄量为37 mmol/mol肌酐对应8小时2 - 乙氧基乙酸乙酯暴露量为2 cm³/m³。该平均EAA排泄量为德国生物耐受值(BAT)的69%,仅为美国生物暴露指数(BEI)值的34%。工作周开始时尿中EAA排泄量比工作周结束时低30 - 40%。另一方面,EAA排泄量比暴露后14 - 16小时测量的值高10 - 20%。轮班后尿中BAA排泄量为75 mmol/mol肌酐对应8小时2 - 丁氧基乙醇和2 - 丁氧基乙酸乙酯暴露量为5 cm³/m³。该BAA排泄量为德国BAT值的87%。
根据这些结果,似乎暴露后14 - 16小时测量的MAA和EAA的BAL分别应为3和50 mmol/mol肌酐。轮班后样本中BAA的BAL值似乎为70 mmol/mol肌酐。这些建议仅在工作周结束时采集样本时有效。