Crowe J M, Simpson K, Johnson W, Allen J
General Campus, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Ontario, Canada.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998 Mar-Apr;19(2):183-6. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199803000-00019.
Photographs frequently are used to document change in the management of hypertrophic scars. The purpose of this study was to design a scale for the analysis of photographs of hypertrophic scars and to test its reliability. The subjects were four occupational and physical therapists, (two novices and two experts), in scar management. Existing scales were modified to produce a new scale. The subjects twice rated four slides from each of ten patients' scars, in random order. They used a Latin Square design. Interrater and test-retest reliabilities were calculated using a weighted kappa statistic. The newly developed scale demonstrated interrater reliability, which ranged between 0.66 and 0.90 for all items. The test-retest reliability ranged between 0.73 and 0.89 for all items. The new scale had substantial reliability (using a single rater) and was at least as reliable when used by novice therapists. This indicated that training had no effect.
照片经常被用于记录增生性瘢痕管理中的变化。本研究的目的是设计一种用于分析增生性瘢痕照片的量表,并测试其可靠性。受试者是四名从事瘢痕管理的职业和物理治疗师(两名新手和两名专家)。对现有的量表进行修改以产生一个新的量表。受试者对来自十名患者瘢痕的四张幻灯片各进行两次评分,评分顺序随机。他们采用拉丁方设计。使用加权kappa统计量计算评分者间信度和重测信度。新开发的量表显示出评分者间信度,所有项目的评分者间信度在0.66至0.90之间。所有项目的重测信度在0.73至0.89之间。新量表具有较高的信度(使用单一评分者),并且新手治疗师使用时至少同样可靠。这表明培训没有效果。