• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?].

作者信息

Holt J, Vold I N

机构信息

Barneavdelingen, Nordland Sentralsykehus, Bodø.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Mar 20;118(8):1218-20.

PMID:9567699
Abstract

In order to explore the possibility of converting a delivery unit at a small hospital to a maternity home, we examined the medical records of those women who delivered by Caesarean section, forceps or vacuum extraction at Lofoten hospital during 1995. How many of these women might it have been necessary to transfer to an obstetrical department if Lofoten hospital had been a maternity home caring for low risk deliveries (primipara and multipara)? Out of a total of 271 deliveries (primiparas 98), 49 women delivered by Caesarean section (n = 35), forceps (n = 5) or vacuum extraction (n = 9). Using risk assessment, 22 women (45%) would have been selected for antenatal transfer, and 20 (41%) for intrapartum transport. For seven women no transfer would have been possible. These women would have delivered locally by vacuum extraction. Primipara versus multipara had a relative risk of 2.8 for Caesarean section or assisted vaginal delivery. It is estimated that 8-9% of the women would be selected prenatally for planned delivery at a hospital unit and that 7-8% would be transferred in labour if primiparas delivered at the maternity home. If primiparas were excluded, the proportions would be 41% and 1-2% respectively. In 1997 the delivery unit at Lofoten hospital was temporarily converted to a maternity home for a period of two years.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Mar 20;118(8):1218-20.
2
Intrapartum transfer from a birth centre to a hospital - reasons, procedures, and consequences.分娩期间从分娩中心转诊至医院——原因、流程及后果。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):422-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340600593174.
3
A free-standing low-risk maternity unit in the United Kingdom: does it have a role?英国一家独立的低风险产科病房:它有作用吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;24(4):360-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610410001685448.
4
Child births in a modified midwife managed unit: selection and transfer according to intended place of delivery.改良助产士管理单元中的分娩:根据预期分娩地点进行选择和转诊
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Mar;80(3):206-12.
5
[Modified midwife managed unit--an alternative for small birthing departments?].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Mar 20;121(8):941-5.
6
Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.不同分娩方式的短期母婴结局。一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Nov;135(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.024. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
7
[Low-risk pregnant women in an obstetric department--how do they give birth?].[产科低风险孕妇——她们如何分娩?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Oct 6;125(19):2635-7.
8
The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in 'standard primigravida'.产房指南对“初产妇标准”产时护理的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Jul 15;115(1):28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.10.036.
9
Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.荷兰低风险妊娠的手术分娩:初级护理与二级护理。
Birth. 2008 Dec;35(4):277-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00254.x.
10
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.