David M, Berg G, Werth I, Pachaly J, Mansfeld A, Kentenich H
Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Frauenheikunde und Geburtshilfe.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):422-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340600593174.
Investigation of the reasons for the transfer of women from a birth centre to a hospital in the course of childbirth as well as modalities and effects.
In the prospective investigation from September 1, 1999 to August 31, 2001, information was collected for all women in Berlin and Bavaria transferred intrapartum from a birth centre to a hospital concerning the reason for the transfer, stage of delivery at the start of transfer, details of the transport, accompaniment, state of mother and medical diagnosis on arrival at the hospital, further progress of delivery, and the condition of the baby postnatum. Comparison groups were formed by all birth centre deliveries in Berlin and Bavaria 1999/2000 (n = 3060) and hospital deliveries in Berlin and Bavaria 1998/1999 (selected data, n = 89 696 births).
Three hundred and sixty transfer cases could be evaluated, and a majority of these were nulliparous. The most frequent reasons for transfer were prior premature rupture of membranes and failure to progress in labor. Fifty-seven percentages of the women who were transferred subsequently delivered spontaneously, with an episiotomy rate of approximately 30%. 1-min Apgar value < or = 7 were frequently in nulliparous and multiparous patients in the transfer group than in the comparison groups, as were 5-min Apgar values < or = 7 and pH < 7.10 in arterial cord blood in particular for nulliparous in the transfer group. Hospitalisation of neonates born to the transfer group and in particular the nulliparous was significantly more common.
Women delivering in a birth centre represent in general a low-risk group as a result of careful preselection by the centres. However, some neonatal data and the high rate of operative deliveries (cesarean section, forceps, and vaginal extraction) indicate that the intrapartum-transferred women, in particular when nulliparous, represent than a special high-risk group.
调查分娩过程中妇女从分娩中心转至医院的原因以及转运方式和影响。
在1999年9月1日至2001年8月31日的前瞻性调查中,收集了柏林和巴伐利亚所有分娩期从分娩中心转至医院的妇女的相关信息,包括转运原因、转运开始时的分娩阶段、转运细节、陪同情况、到达医院时母亲的状况和医学诊断、分娩的进一步进展以及产后婴儿状况。对照组由1999/2000年柏林和巴伐利亚所有分娩中心分娩的产妇(n = 3060)以及1998/1999年柏林和巴伐利亚医院分娩的产妇(部分数据,n = 89696例分娩)组成。
可评估360例转运病例,其中大多数为初产妇。最常见的转运原因是胎膜早破和产程无进展。随后转运的妇女中有57%自然分娩,会阴切开率约为30%。转运组初产妇和经产妇的1分钟阿氏评分≤7分的情况比对照组更常见,5分钟阿氏评分≤7分以及脐动脉血pH<7.10的情况在转运组初产妇中尤其常见。转运组出生的新生儿尤其是初产妇的新生儿住院情况明显更常见。
由于分娩中心进行了仔细的预先筛选,在分娩中心分娩的妇女总体上属于低风险群体。然而,一些新生儿数据和较高的手术分娩率(剖宫产、产钳助产和阴道助产)表明,分娩期转运的妇女,尤其是初产妇,代表了一个特殊的高风险群体。