• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受腹腔镜或开放修补术的消化性溃疡穿孔患者急性期反应和内毒素血症的随机对照研究

A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair.

作者信息

Lau J Y, Lo S Y, Ng E K, Lee D W, Lam Y H, Chung S C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1998 Apr;175(4):325-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00006-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00006-3
PMID:9568663
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers, we compared acute stress responses, endotoxemia, and bacteremia following laparoscopic or open surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers were randomized to receive laparoscopic sutured or open omental repair. Undiluted peritoneal fluid was obtained at surgery for quantitative bacterial and endotoxin (Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate) assay. Serial blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes, and at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hours for determinations of quantitative bacterial and endotoxin assays, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were randomized: laparoscopy group (n = 12), open repair group (n = 10). Conversions were required in 3 patients assigned to laparoscopy, leaving 9 patients for analysis. The two groups were comparable in their demographic data, median duration of perforation (13.5 hours versus 10 hours), severity of peritoneal contamination as indicated by viable bacterial count (5.9 x 102 versus 1.5 x 10(2) colony forming unit/mL) and endotoxin concentration in peritoneal fluid (27.2 versus 24.6 EU/mL). No significant endotoxemia or bacteremia was detected in these patients. Median interleukin-6 was highest at 0 hour (1520 versus 962 pg/mL) and fell rapidly following surgery. C-reactive protein peaked at 24 hours and plateaued thereafter. Cortisol was highest intraoperatively and fell thereafter. No difference was noted between the two treatment groups with respect to these inflammatory markers (IL-6 P = 0.19, CRP P = 0.14, cortisol P = 0.56, multivariate analysis of variance).

CONCLUSION

Endotoxemia and bacteremia are insignificant in most patients with perforated peptic ulcers. In patients with perforated peptic ulcers, laparoscopic patch repair does not reduce acute stress responses when compared with open surgery.

摘要

背景

在患有消化性溃疡穿孔所致腹膜炎的患者中,我们比较了腹腔镜手术或开放手术后的急性应激反应、内毒素血症和菌血症。

患者与方法

将连续的消化性溃疡穿孔所致腹膜炎患者随机分为接受腹腔镜缝合或开放大网膜修补术两组。手术时获取未稀释的腹腔积液用于定量细菌和内毒素(鲎试剂)检测。在0、30、60、90、120和180分钟以及12、24、48、72和120小时采集系列血样,用于定量细菌和内毒素检测、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和皮质醇的测定。

结果

22例患者被随机分组:腹腔镜组(n = 12),开放修补组(n = 10)。3例分配至腹腔镜组的患者需要中转开腹,最终9例患者纳入分析。两组在人口统计学数据、穿孔中位持续时间(13.5小时对10小时)、腹腔污染严重程度(以活菌计数表示,5.9×10²对1.5×10²菌落形成单位/mL)以及腹腔积液内毒素浓度(27.2对24.6 EU/mL)方面具有可比性。这些患者中未检测到明显的内毒素血症或菌血症。白细胞介素-6中位数在0小时最高(1520对962 pg/mL),术后迅速下降。C反应蛋白在24小时达到峰值,此后趋于平稳。皮质醇在术中最高,此后下降。在这些炎症标志物方面,两个治疗组之间未观察到差异(IL-6 P = 0.19,CRP P = 0.14,皮质醇P = 0.56,多因素方差分析)。

结论

在大多数消化性溃疡穿孔患者中,内毒素血症和菌血症并不显著。在消化性溃疡穿孔患者中,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜补片修补术并不能减轻急性应激反应。

相似文献

1
A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair.接受腹腔镜或开放修补术的消化性溃疡穿孔患者急性期反应和内毒素血症的随机对照研究
Am J Surg. 1998 Apr;175(4):325-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00006-3.
2
Peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcer and immune response.消化性溃疡穿孔所致腹膜炎与免疫反应
J Invest Surg. 2013 Oct;26(5):294-304. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.762073. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
3
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
4
Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair.无网膜补片的腹腔镜下消化性溃疡穿孔修补术与传统开放修补术的对比
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):615-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0195.
5
A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique.一项比较腹腔镜与开放手术,采用缝合或非缝合技术修复穿孔性消化性溃疡的随机研究。
Ann Surg. 1996 Aug;224(2):131-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199608000-00004.
6
Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment.穿孔性阑尾炎所致腹膜炎:腹腔镜或开放手术后的应激反应
Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):582-90.
7
Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.腹腔镜网膜补片修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔
Ann Surg. 1995 Mar;221(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199503000-00004.
8
Endotoxemia and acute-phase proteins in major abdominal surgery.腹部大手术中的内毒素血症与急性期蛋白
Am J Surg. 2001 Jan;181(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00534-1.
9
Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease.开放性与腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病的比较。
World J Surg. 2008 Nov;32(11):2371-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9707-5.
10
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡。腹腔镜在弥漫性腹膜炎中的作用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Jan;82(1):6-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.消化性溃疡穿孔的治疗方法:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Sep 5;410(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03848-9.
2
Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer: systematic scoping review and in-depth evaluation of existing evidence.腹腔镜与开放性修补穿孔性消化性溃疡:系统的范围综述及对现有证据的深入评估
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae163.
3
Laparoscopic suture repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease: a meta-review and trial sequential analysis.
腹腔镜缝合修复术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病:一项Meta综述与试验序贯分析
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 12;12:1496192. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1496192. eCollection 2025.
4
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡:一项多中心、倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01681-1.
5
Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡病的疗效优于开放性修补。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):618-625. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4047-8. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
6
Surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcers: laparoscopic versus open approach.穿孔性消化性溃疡的外科修补:腹腔镜与开放手术比较。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6366-y. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.穿孔性消化性溃疡修补术:腹腔镜手术中转及术后感染性并发症的预测因素
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2186-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3516-z.
8
An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的最新荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 9;5:13976. doi: 10.1038/srep13976.
9
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer.腹腔镜与开腹修补穿孔性消化性溃疡的Meta分析
JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):15-22. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13517013317752.
10
Systemic inflammation and immune response after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in patients with acute cholecystitis, complicated by peritonitis.开腹手术与腹腔镜手术治疗合并腹膜炎的急性胆囊炎患者的全身炎症和免疫反应。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Apr 27;5(4):73-82. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i4.73.