• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[右髂区疼痛患者的视频腹腔镜检查]

[Video laparoscopy in patients with pain in the right iliac region].

作者信息

Saviano M, Piccoli M, Menozzi M, Gelmini R, Heydari A

机构信息

Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Università degli Studi, Modena.

出版信息

Minerva Chir. 1998 Jan-Feb;53(1-2):15-21.

PMID:9577131
Abstract

The authors report on their experience of 235 laparotomy operations and 125 laparoscopic operations performed on patients with right lower abdominal pain. Concerning each of these different approaches, the authors analyzed and compared preoperative diagnosis, anatomo-pathological findings, intraoperative and early post operative morbidity and hospital stay. The ratio of negative open-appendectomies was 24.1% (56 cases out of 233). The laparoscopic approach, performed on 88 cases of suspected appendicitis, allowed to document and to treat other pathologies, real causes of the lower right abdominal pain, in 42 cases (47.7%). The rate of conversion from laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy was only 2.19% (2 cases out of 91). The morbidity rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was estimated at 6.5% (4.4% major complications, 2.2% minor complications). The morbidity rate of open appendectomy was estimated at 8.9% (0.4% major complications, 8.5% minor complications). Though the median postoperative stay, after laparotomy approach, was slightly longer (2.6 days versus 2.4 days), the difference was not statistically significant. Based on these results, the authors conclude that the laparoscopic approach should be reserved for fertile female patients, especially when the diagnosis of appendicitis is uncertain.

摘要

作者报告了他们对235例接受剖腹手术和125例接受腹腔镜手术的右下腹痛患者的治疗经验。针对每种不同的手术方式,作者分析并比较了术前诊断、解剖病理学发现、术中及术后早期的发病率和住院时间。阴性开腹阑尾切除术的比例为24.1%(233例中有56例)。对88例疑似阑尾炎患者采用腹腔镜手术方式,发现并治疗了42例(47.7%)其他导致右下腹痛的真正病因。从腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹阑尾切除术的比例仅为2.19%(91例中有2例)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术的发病率估计为6.5%(严重并发症占4.4%,轻微并发症占2.2%)。开腹阑尾切除术的发病率估计为8.9%(严重并发症占0.4%,轻微并发症占8.5%)。尽管剖腹手术方式术后的中位住院时间略长(2.6天对2.4天),但差异无统计学意义。基于这些结果,作者得出结论,腹腔镜手术方式应仅用于育龄女性患者,尤其是在阑尾炎诊断不确定时。

相似文献

1
[Video laparoscopy in patients with pain in the right iliac region].[右髂区疼痛患者的视频腹腔镜检查]
Minerva Chir. 1998 Jan-Feb;53(1-2):15-21.
2
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心前瞻性非随机研究的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1146-52.
4
[Laparoscopic approach in acute appendicitis: experience with 501 consecutive cases].[急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术方法:501例连续病例的经验]
Chir Ital. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):327-35.
5
[The rationale of laparoscopic treatment in acute appendiceal disease].[急性阑尾疾病的腹腔镜治疗原理]
Chir Ital. 2000 Mar-Apr;52(2):171-8.
6
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
7
[Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in suspected acute appendicitis in female patients].[女性疑似急性阑尾炎患者的腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术对比]
Ann Ital Chir. 2002 Jan-Feb;73(1):59-63.
8
[Retrospective comparative study of 600 appendectomies carried out by laparotomy (Mac Burney) or laparoscopy. A plea for laparoscopy].
Chirurgie. 1993;119(9):504-10.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
10
[Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].[开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Apr;130(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836411.