Cummings K M, Hyland A, Lewit E, Shopland D
Department of Cancer Control and Epidemiology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.
Tob Control. 1997;6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S38-43. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s38.
To examine the extent and type of cigarette brand switching by adult smokers. To evaluate discrepancies between actual and projected cigarette brand sales based on changes in adult smoking patterns.
Data analysed come from a cohort tracking survey of 11966 cigarette smokers aged 25-64 years from 20 communities in the United States who were followed between 1988 and 1993 as part of the National Cancer Institute's Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation.
Respondents were asked about their current cigarette brand in 1988 and 1993. Brand switching was inferred when a smoker reported a different cigarette brand in 1988 and 1993. Company switching was defined as brand switching for whom a different parent company was identified for the 1993 brand compared with the brand used in 1988. A ratio measure was computed to reflect gains in market share from brand switching and losses from brand switching, quitting, and death, for specific cigarette brands, between 1988 and 1993. This ratio measure was used to estimate the projected unit sales for top-selling premium brands in 1993 and was compared with actual unit sales for the same year.
We estimate that an average of 9.5% of smokers switched cigarettes brands and 7.6% switched companies each year. Most of those who did switch cigarette brands changed from a premium brand to a discount or generic brand. Between 1988 and 1993, top-selling premium brands such as Marlboro, Camel, and Newport, lost about four times as many adult smokers as they gained. Whereas premium brand cigarettes lost some smokers to discount and generic cigarettes, over 50% of losses were due to smokers quitting or dying. Actual unit sales were substantially higher than projected sales (based on adult market share) for Marlboro and Camel, but not for other brands.
Most smokers are brand loyal. Price seems to be an important factor motivating brand switching among adult smokers. It appears that recruitment of new customers among the ranks of non-smokers is necessary for premium cigarette brands such as Marlboro and Camel to maintain sales comparable to previous years.
研究成年吸烟者更换香烟品牌的程度和类型。基于成年吸烟模式的变化,评估实际香烟品牌销量与预期销量之间的差异。
分析的数据来自一项队列追踪调查,该调查对美国20个社区的11966名年龄在25 - 64岁的吸烟者进行了追踪,时间跨度为1988年至1993年,这是美国国立癌症研究所戒烟社区干预试验的一部分。
询问受访者在1988年和1993年使用的香烟品牌。当吸烟者在1988年和1993年报告使用不同的香烟品牌时,推断为品牌更换。公司更换定义为1993年使用的品牌与1988年使用的品牌相比,母公司不同的品牌更换情况。计算一个比率指标,以反映1988年至1993年期间特定香烟品牌因品牌更换、戒烟和死亡导致的市场份额增加和减少情况。该比率指标用于估计1993年畅销高端品牌的预期销量,并与同年的实际销量进行比较。
我们估计,平均每年有9.5%的吸烟者更换香烟品牌,7.6%的吸烟者更换公司。大多数更换香烟品牌的人从高端品牌换成了折扣或普通品牌。1988年至1993年期间,万宝路、骆驼和新港等畅销高端品牌失去的成年吸烟者数量约为新增数量的四倍。虽然高端品牌香烟的一些吸烟者转向了折扣和普通香烟,但超过50%的流失是由于吸烟者戒烟或死亡。万宝路和骆驼的实际销量大幅高于预期销量(基于成年市场份额),但其他品牌并非如此。
大多数吸烟者对品牌忠诚。价格似乎是促使成年吸烟者更换品牌的一个重要因素。对于万宝路和骆驼等高端香烟品牌来说,要保持与前几年相当的销量,似乎有必要在非吸烟者中招募新客户。