• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design.

作者信息

Norton M R

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Aug;8(4):290-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
PMID:9586476
Abstract

Dental implants are subject to large and highly complex loads of varying magnitude, duration and vector. Bridge performance is closely related to load transmission both at the bone to implant interface and between components within the implant-abutment-bridge cylinder complex. The design of the interface between components within this complex may have a profound influence on the long term function of the implant supported prosthesis. An in vitro evaluation of implants 3.5 mm in diameter, utilizing an internal conical interface has demonstrated increased resistance to bending moments at the fixture-abutment interface (P = 0.00010) and at the abutment-bridge cylinder interface (P < 0.01), when compared to a standard 3.75 mm implant with a hex mediated, butt joint interface. The relatively small values for coefficient of variance measured in both systems would confirm that whilst the size of data is small, it is nonetheless a reliable indication of the relative strength of these implant designs.

摘要

相似文献

1
An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Aug;8(4):290-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x.
2
An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1-piece and 2-piece conical abutment joint in implant design.种植体设计中一体式和两件式锥形基台连接强度的体外评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):458-64. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005458.x.
3
A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.两种不同牙种植体的有限元分析:假体、基台、种植体及支持骨中的应力分布
J Oral Implantol. 2008;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[1:AFEAOT]2.0.CO;2.
4
Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.带有分段式和非分段式基台的种植体-牙齿连接修复体的光弹性应力分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00167-7.
5
Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.使用有限元分析研究种植体基台类型在不同加载条件下对骨组织应力分布的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):195-202.
6
Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical.种植体-基台界面:平顶与锥形的生物力学研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00104.x.
7
A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.两种不同刚性种植体设计用于远中游离端固定义齿时应力与应变分布特征的比较。
Quintessence Int. 1996 Jan;27(1):11-7.
8
The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.骨质量对牙种植体固定局部义齿生物力学行为的影响:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):e143-e154. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5254.
9
In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems.两种市售种植体系统中锥形种植体与基台连接强度的体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 May;83(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70016-3.
10
Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis.植入物设计与界面力传递:光弹性与应变片分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):249-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00979.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Fluid Contamination on Reverse Torque of Healing Abutments in Two Implant Connection Systems: In Vitro Study.两种种植体连接系统中液体污染对愈合基台反向扭矩的影响:体外研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70056. doi: 10.1111/cid.70056.
2
Effect of implant‒abutment connections on abutment screw loosening: An in vitro study.种植体-基台连接对基台螺丝松动的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Winter;18(1):17-22. doi: 10.34172/joddd.29883. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3
Microleakage assessment of CAD-CAM Cobalt-Chrome and Zirconia abutments on a conical connection dental implant: A comparative in vitro study.
CAD-CAM 钴铬和氧化锆基台在锥形连接牙科种植体上的微渗漏评估:一项体外比较研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Sep;33(9):945-952. doi: 10.1111/clr.13973. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Prosthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses supported by locking-taper implants: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.锁扣式种植体支持的固定义齿修复体的修复并发症:一项平均随访 5 年的回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 27;21(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01843-2.
5
A 3D Finite Element Analysis Model of Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis under Dynamic Impact Loading for Evaluation of Stress in the Crown, Abutment and Cortical Bone Using Different Rehabilitation Materials.用于评估不同修复材料下单颗种植体支持式修复体在动态冲击载荷下冠部、基台和皮质骨应力的三维有限元分析模型
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 24;14(13):3519. doi: 10.3390/ma14133519.
6
Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.不同种植体-基台连接的机械行为研究综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228685.
7
Bone turnover markers to assess jawbone quality prior to dental implant treatment: a case-control study.在种植牙治疗前使用骨转换标志物评估颌骨质量:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 3;6(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00264-0.
8
Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.循环加载后莫氏锥度内连接式种植体中CAD/CAM基台与预制基台的比较:轴向位移、拆除扭矩和拉伸拆除力。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Dec;11(6):305-312. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.6.305. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
A Comparative 3D Finite Element Computational Study of Three Connections.三种连接方式的三维有限元对比计算研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 26;12(19):3135. doi: 10.3390/ma12193135.
10
Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: An study.通过种植体-基台连接类型对轴向位移进行数字评估:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;10(5):388-394. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388. Epub 2018 Oct 22.