Norton M R
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Aug;8(4):290-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x.
Dental implants are subject to large and highly complex loads of varying magnitude, duration and vector. Bridge performance is closely related to load transmission both at the bone to implant interface and between components within the implant-abutment-bridge cylinder complex. The design of the interface between components within this complex may have a profound influence on the long term function of the implant supported prosthesis. An in vitro evaluation of implants 3.5 mm in diameter, utilizing an internal conical interface has demonstrated increased resistance to bending moments at the fixture-abutment interface (P = 0.00010) and at the abutment-bridge cylinder interface (P < 0.01), when compared to a standard 3.75 mm implant with a hex mediated, butt joint interface. The relatively small values for coefficient of variance measured in both systems would confirm that whilst the size of data is small, it is nonetheless a reliable indication of the relative strength of these implant designs.