• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃离子根管封闭剂的体外抗菌活性

In vitro antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer endodontic sealer.

作者信息

Shalhav M, Fuss Z, Weiss E I

机构信息

Section of Oral Biology, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

J Endod. 1997 Oct;23(10):616-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80172-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80172-0
PMID:9587273
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of a recently introduced glass ionomer endodontic sealer, Ketac Endo (KE), compared to a commonly used ZOE-based endodontic sealer, Roth's cement (RC). With the use of E. faecalis as a test organism, the agar diffusion test (ADT) and direct contact test (DCT) were performed. For the DCT, the sealers were mixed and placed on the side wall of microtiter plate wells. A 10 microL bacterial suspension was placed on the tested material samples 20 min, 24 h, and 7 days after mixing. Bacteria were allowed to directly contact the sealers for 1 h at 37 degrees C. Fresh media was then added and bacterial growth was measured every 30 min over 15 h. The results showed that in the ADT, freshly mixed KE exhibited a twofold greater inhibition zone than RC (p < 0.05); in the DCT, freshly mixed KE and RC completely inhibited bacterial growth. The 24-h and 7-day samples of KE showed no antibacterial activity, whereas RC continued to exhibit a strong effect with similar samples. It has been concluded that KE possesses a short-acting very potent and diffusable antibacterial activity, whereas RC extends its effect over 7 days after setting.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估一种最近推出的玻璃离子根管封闭剂Ketac Endo(KE)与常用的基于氧化锌丁香酚的根管封闭剂Roth's cement(RC)相比的抗菌活性。以粪肠球菌作为测试微生物,进行了琼脂扩散试验(ADT)和直接接触试验(DCT)。对于DCT,将封闭剂混合后放置在微量滴定板孔的侧壁上。在混合后20分钟、24小时和7天,将10微升细菌悬液放置在测试材料样品上。使细菌在37℃下与封闭剂直接接触1小时。然后加入新鲜培养基,并在15小时内每30分钟测量一次细菌生长情况。结果表明,在ADT中,新鲜混合的KE表现出比RC大两倍的抑菌圈(p < 0.05);在DCT中,新鲜混合的KE和RC完全抑制了细菌生长。KE的24小时和7天样品没有抗菌活性,而RC在类似样品中继续表现出很强的效果。得出的结论是,KE具有短效的非常强效且可扩散的抗菌活性,而RC在凝固后7天内仍能发挥作用。

相似文献

1
In vitro antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer endodontic sealer.玻璃离子根管封闭剂的体外抗菌活性
J Endod. 1997 Oct;23(10):616-9. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80172-0.
2
In vitro antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers.根管封闭剂的体外抗菌活性。
J Dent. 2006 Jan;34(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.001.
3
Assessment of antibacterial activity of EndoREZ.EndoREZ抗菌活性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Jul;102(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.017. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
4
Antibacterial effect of selected root-end filling materials.所选根尖充填材料的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.009. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
5
In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods.采用两种不同方法对根管封闭剂进行体外抗菌活性研究。
J Endod. 2004 Jan;30(1):57-60. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200401000-00013.
6
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of three endodontic sealers mixed with amoxicillin.体外评价三种牙胶密封剂混合阿莫西林的抗菌效果。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.033. Epub 2010 May 13.
7
Effect of various mixing ratios on antibacterial properties and hardness of endodontic sealers.不同混合比例对根管封闭剂抗菌性能和硬度的影响。
J Endod. 2000 Sep;26(9):519-22. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200009000-00008.
8
Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers.两种基于 MTA 的根管封闭剂的抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01931.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
9
Antibacterial activity of calcium hydroxide-containing endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis in vitro.含氢氧化钙的根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的体外抗菌活性
Int Endod J. 1997 Nov;30(6):397-402. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00103.x.
10
A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.三种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果和流变性比较评价
Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles against Cariogenic Pathogens - An Study.银纳米颗粒绿色合成对致龋病原体的抗菌效果——一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1188-S1192. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_338_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Antimicrobial efficacy of liquorice against biofilms in various concentrations at time-dependent variables: An study.甘草在不同浓度下随时间变化对生物膜的抗菌效果:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):7-11. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_173_18.
3
The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of dental glass-ionomer cements: a review.
抗菌添加剂对牙科玻璃离子水门汀性能的影响:综述
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2019 Jan 10;5(1):9-21. doi: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1539623. eCollection 2019.
4
Antibacterial efficacy of AH Plus and AH26 sealers mixed with amoxicillin, triple antibiotic paste and nanosilver.AH Plus和AH26封闭剂与阿莫西林、三联抗生素糊剂及纳米银混合后的抗菌效果
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016 Fall;10(4):220-225. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.035. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Clinical applications of glass ionomers in endodontics: a review.玻璃离子体在牙髓病学中的临床应用:综述。
Int Dent J. 2012 Oct;62(5):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2012.00125.x.
6
An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study.通过直接接触试验评估四种根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性:一项体外研究。
ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:989781. doi: 10.5402/2012/989781. Epub 2012 Jul 19.