Kaufman A Y, Fuss Z, Keila S, Waxenberg S
Department of Endodontology, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Int Endod J. 1997 Nov;30(6):403-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00107.x.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the electronic apex locator Root ZX compared to the Sono Explorer Mark II Junior and Apit III in detecting root perforations. Extracted human teeth (n = 30) were perforated artificially in the middle third of the root and embedded in a box containing alginate. Detection of all perforations were carried out with K-files attached to the apex locators tested. The teeth were radiographed after each electronic measurement. The actual location of the tip of the file in relation to the external root surface and the radiographic determination of the perforations were carried out using a stereomicroscope. The mean distance of the tip of the file from the external outline of the root surface was short for all instruments and clinically acceptable (0.06-0.25 mm). There was no clinically significant difference between the morphometric measurements and the radiographic measurements. No statistical significance was found between large perforations (0.55-0.60 mm) and small perforations (0.25-0.40 mm). Under the conditions of this study, all electronic apex locators tested were acceptable clinical tools in the detection of root perforations.
本研究的目的是评估电子根尖定位仪Root ZX与Sono Explorer Mark II Junior和Apit III相比在检测根管侧穿方面的准确性。将拔除的人牙(n = 30)在牙根中1/3处人工穿孔,然后嵌入装有藻酸盐的盒子中。使用连接到受试根尖定位仪的K锉进行所有穿孔的检测。每次电子测量后对牙齿进行X线摄影。使用体视显微镜确定锉尖相对于牙根外表面的实际位置以及穿孔的X线片判定。所有器械的锉尖到牙根表面外轮廓的平均距离均较短且在临床可接受范围内(0.06 - 0.25 mm)。形态测量和X线测量之间无临床显著差异。大穿孔(0.55 - 0.60 mm)和小穿孔(0.25 - 0.40 mm)之间未发现统计学差异。在本研究条件下,所有受试电子根尖定位仪都是检测根管侧穿可接受的临床工具。