Cardoso M M, Banner M J, Melker R J, Bjoraker D G
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):957-64. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00036.
To review the operational characteristics of commercial devices used to detect endotracheal intubation; and to identify an ideal device for detecting endotracheal intubation in emergency situations, especially in the prehospital setting during cardiac arrest.
Relevant articles from the medical literature are referenced.
The authors identified the need for understanding the basic operation principles of portable devices used to detect endotracheal intubation and to correctly use them in unpredictable clinical situations.
Data from published literature.
Recently, a number of new portable devices have been marketed for detecting endotracheal intubation, each having advantages and disadvantages, especially when used during emergency situations. The devices are classified based on their principle of operation. Some rely on CO2 detection (STATCAP, Easy Cap, and Pedi-Cap), others utilize the transmission of light (Trachlight, SURCH-LITE), one operates based on reflection of sound energy (SCOTI), and some depend on aspiration of air (TubeChek and TubeChek-B). A brief description of each device and its operational characteristics are reviewed. A comparative analysis among the devices is made based on size, portability, cost, ease of operation, need for calibration or regular maintenance, reliability for patients with and without cardiac arrest, and the possibility of use for adult and pediatric patients. False-negative and false-positive results for each device are also discussed. False-negative results mean that although the endotracheal tube is in the trachea, the device indicates it is not. False-positive results mean that although the endotracheal tube is in the esophagus, the device indicates it is in the trachea.
Although no clinical comparative study of commercial devices to detect endotracheal intubation exists, the syringe device (TubeChek) has most of the characteristics necessary for a device to be considered ideal in emergency situations in the prehospital setting. It is simple, inexpensive, easy to handle and operate, disposable, does not require maintenance, gives reliable results for patients with and without cardiac arrest, and can be used for almost all age groups. The device may yield false-negative results, most commonly in the presence of copious secretions and in cases of accidental endobronchial intubation. Regardless of the device used, clinical judgment and direct visualization of the endotracheal tube in the trachea are required to unequivocally confirm proper endotracheal tube placement.
回顾用于检测气管插管的商用设备的操作特性;并确定一种在紧急情况下,尤其是在心脏骤停的院前环境中检测气管插管的理想设备。
引用医学文献中的相关文章。
作者认识到有必要了解用于检测气管插管的便携式设备的基本操作原理,并在不可预测的临床情况下正确使用它们。
来自已发表文献的数据。
最近,一些用于检测气管插管的新型便携式设备已投放市场,每种设备都有其优缺点,尤其是在紧急情况下使用时。这些设备根据其操作原理进行分类。一些依靠二氧化碳检测(STATCAP、Easy Cap和Pedi-Cap),其他利用光的传输(Trachlight、SURCH-LITE),一种基于声能反射操作(SCOTI),还有一些依靠空气抽吸(TubeChek和TubeChek-B)。对每种设备及其操作特性进行了简要描述。基于尺寸、便携性、成本、操作简便性、校准或定期维护需求、对有或无心脏骤停患者的可靠性以及成人和儿童患者使用的可能性,对这些设备进行了比较分析。还讨论了每种设备的假阴性和假阳性结果。假阴性结果意味着尽管气管导管在气管内,但设备显示不在。假阳性结果意味着尽管气管导管在食管内,但设备显示在气管内。
虽然目前尚无关于检测气管插管的商用设备的临床比较研究,但注射器设备(TubeChek)具备在院前环境紧急情况下被视为理想设备所需的大部分特性。它简单、便宜、易于操作和使用,一次性使用,无需维护,对有或无心脏骤停的患者都能给出可靠结果,并且几乎可用于所有年龄组。该设备可能会产生假阴性结果,最常见于有大量分泌物和意外支气管内插管的情况。无论使用何种设备,都需要临床判断和直接观察气管内的气管导管,以明确确认气管导管放置正确。