Martin F E
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Surry Hills, Australia.
J Dent. 1998 Mar;26(3):239-43. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00004-3.
The purpose of this study was to survey the efficiency of visible light curing units in dental practices across Australia.
Survey forms were distributed to representatives of 3M Health Care to complete when visiting dentists in their working areas. The information collected included the type and age of the unit, curing times used, history of maintenance, replacement of components, and the light intensity reading.
Of the 214 light curing units surveyed, approximately 27% recorded a light intensity of 200 mW cm-2 or less, a level regarded as inadequate to cure a 2-mm thick increment of composite resin. An additional 26% registered an output of between 201 and 399 mW m-2. This level would be considered acceptable with additional curing time; however, 44% of practitioners were curing for 20 s or less. A negative correlation was found between the age of the unit and the intensity recorded. Nearly 50% of respondents had never checked the light output of their unit.
The results indicate that just over one-half of the light curing units surveyed were not functioning satisfactorily. An obvious reduction in intensity was noted with the older units. There is a substantial lack of awareness among dentists of the need for maintenance and regular checking of the light intensity of these units.
本研究旨在调查澳大利亚各地牙科诊所中可见光固化灯的使用效率。
向3M医疗保健公司的代表发放调查问卷,以便他们在访问工作区域内的牙医时填写。收集的信息包括固化灯的类型和使用年限、使用的固化时间、维护历史、部件更换情况以及光强读数。
在接受调查的214台光固化灯中,约27%的光强记录为200 mW/cm²或更低,这一强度被认为不足以固化2毫米厚的复合树脂增量。另外26%的光固化灯输出功率在201至399 mW/m²之间。在延长固化时间的情况下,这一水平可被认为是可接受的;然而,44%的从业者固化时间为20秒或更短。发现固化灯的使用年限与记录的光强之间存在负相关。近50%的受访者从未检查过他们的固化灯的光输出。
结果表明,接受调查的光固化灯中,略超过一半的运行情况不尽人意。较旧的固化灯光强明显降低。牙医们对这些设备进行维护和定期检查光强的必要性普遍缺乏认识。