• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计一项针对多策略社区干预措施的评估:北海岸“站稳脚跟”项目。

Designing an evaluation for a multiple-strategy community intervention: the North Coast Stay on Your Feet program.

作者信息

van Beurden E, Kempton A, Sladden T, Garner E

机构信息

Northern Rivers Institute of Health and Research, Lismore, NSW.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Feb;22(1):115-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01154.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01154.x
PMID:9599862
Abstract

Evaluation of the North Coast Stay on Your Feet falls prevention program is described as a case study of a comprehensive evaluation design for multi-strategic community interventions. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to evaluate the program at formative, process and outcome levels. Formative evaluation used literature review, focus groups, mail-out and telephone survey methods to gather evidence from publications, older people, health workers, local business, media and government bodies. It included an analysis of demographic and hospital databases and identified incidence, causal pathways, knowledge, attitudes, behaviour, consequences and effectiveness of potential strategies. Process evaluation employed auditing, monitoring and telephone surveys to maintain an inventory of intervention activities and to track the reach of the program. Outcome evaluation involved a longitudinal study of intervention and control cohorts, surveyed before, during and after the intervention by telephone to monitor changes in knowledge, attitudes, risk and falls incidence. The survey instrument was designed for both formative and outcome evaluation, and analysis reflected the research design by incorporating repeat measures and adjusting for bias and confounding. Outcome validity was cross-checked via hospital admission rates. A novel, integrated framework for presenting inputs, activities and outcomes from all stages of the program is described. This framework facilitated feedback to stakeholders and enabled subsequent rapid adjustment of the intervention. Rigorous evaluation combined with clear presentation of findings helped to engender intersectoral support and obtain funding grants for extended implementation and evaluation. It also helped Stay on Your Feet to become a model for other falls prevention programs within Australia and internationally.

摘要

对北海岸“站稳脚跟”跌倒预防项目的评估被描述为一个针对多策略社区干预的综合评估设计的案例研究。采用定性和定量方法在形成性、过程性和结果性层面评估该项目。形成性评估使用文献综述、焦点小组、邮寄和电话调查方法,从出版物、老年人、卫生工作者、当地企业、媒体和政府机构收集证据。它包括对人口统计和医院数据库的分析,并确定潜在策略的发生率、因果途径、知识、态度、行为、后果和有效性。过程评估采用审计、监测和电话调查,以维护干预活动清单并跟踪项目的覆盖范围。结果评估涉及对干预组和对照组的纵向研究,在干预前、干预期间和干预后通过电话进行调查,以监测知识、态度、风险和跌倒发生率的变化。调查工具专为形成性和结果性评估设计,分析通过纳入重复测量并调整偏差和混杂因素反映了研究设计。通过医院入院率对结果有效性进行交叉核对。描述了一个用于呈现项目所有阶段的投入、活动和结果的新颖综合框架。该框架促进了向利益相关者的反馈,并使干预措施能够随后迅速调整。严格的评估与清晰的结果呈现相结合,有助于获得跨部门支持,并为扩大实施和评估获得资金资助。它还帮助“站稳脚跟”项目成为澳大利亚国内和国际上其他跌倒预防项目的典范。

相似文献

1
Designing an evaluation for a multiple-strategy community intervention: the North Coast Stay on Your Feet program.设计一项针对多策略社区干预措施的评估:北海岸“站稳脚跟”项目。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Feb;22(1):115-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01154.x.
2
Program sustainability of a community-based intervention to prevent falls among older Australians.一项基于社区的预防澳大利亚老年人跌倒干预措施的项目可持续性。
Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):281-8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah302.
3
Community-based interventions to promote increased physical activity: a primer.基于社区的促进身体活动增加的干预措施:入门指南。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(4):173-87. doi: 10.1007/BF03256132.
4
Educating health professionals to optimise falls screening in hospitals: protocol for a mixed methods study.教育卫生专业人员以优化医院的跌倒筛查:一项混合方法研究的方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4899-y.
5
Effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing falls: a systematic review of recent 10 years and meta-analysis.干预项目预防跌倒的效果:最近 10 年的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):188.e13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Understanding the implementation and efficacy of a home-based strength and balance fall prevention intervention in people aged 50 years or over with vision impairment: a process evaluation protocol.了解针对50岁及以上视力障碍者的家庭力量与平衡跌倒预防干预措施的实施情况和效果:一项过程评估方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3304-6.
7
RESPOND: a patient-centred programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall-protocol for a mixed methods programme evaluation.应对:一项以患者为中心的项目,旨在预防因跌倒而到急诊科就诊的老年人再次跌倒,采用混合方法进行项目评估的跌倒协议。
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22(2):153-60. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041453. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
Evidence for success in health promotion: suggestions for improvement.健康促进成功的证据:改进建议。
Health Educ Res. 1996 Sep;11(3):367-76. doi: 10.1093/her/11.3.367.
9
Economic analysis of a community-based falls prevention program.一项基于社区的跌倒预防计划的经济分析。
Public Health. 2006 Aug;120(8):742-51. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
10
Fall rates in hospital rehabilitation units after individualised patient and staff education programmes: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.个体化患者和员工教育计划后医院康复病房的跌倒率:一项实用的、阶梯式、群组随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2592-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61945-0. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a single home-based fall prevention program: a prospective observational study based on questionnaires and claims data.一项单一的居家预防跌倒计划的有效性和成本效益:一项基于问卷调查和理赔数据的前瞻性观察性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 28;24(1):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05586-x.
2
Population-based interventions for preventing falls and fall-related injuries in older people.基于人群的干预措施预防老年人跌倒和与跌倒相关的伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 5;1(1):CD013789. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013789.pub2.
3
Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study.
参与多学科居家预防跌倒项目的全科医生、家庭护理护士、物理治疗师及老年人的经验:一项混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5.
4
The population approach to falls injury prevention in older people: findings of a two community trial.老年人跌倒伤害预防的人群方法:两项社区试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Feb 19;10:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-79.
5
Fall prevention in the elderly population.老年人群体中的跌倒预防
CMAJ. 2004 Sep 28;171(7):724. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041381.
6
A sustainable programme to prevent falls and near falls in community dwelling older people: results of a randomised trial.一项预防社区居住老年人跌倒及跌倒未遂的可持续计划:一项随机试验的结果
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Mar;54(3):227-32. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.3.227.
7
Exercise in preventing falls and fall related injuries in older people: a review of randomised controlled trials.运动对预防老年人跌倒及跌倒相关损伤的作用:随机对照试验综述
Br J Sports Med. 2000 Feb;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.1.7.