Suppr超能文献

患者对用于研究目的的残余血液的看法。

Patients' views on residual blood use for research purposes.

作者信息

Hamajima N, Tajima K, Oya H, Kato T, Okuma K, Kaneda H, Moritaka S, Kato T

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya.

出版信息

Jpn J Cancer Res. 1998 Mar;89(3):341-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00568.x.

Abstract

In order to document patients' views on residual blood use for research purposes, a questionnaire survey was conducted at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital in October 1997. Subjects were patients who had undergone blood tests at a central blood sampling room in the morning during the week of the study enrollment. The questionnaire was handed out and collected at a waiting area in front of the blood sampling room. Of the 583 patients to whom we tried to hand out the questionnaire, 558 participated (258 males, 294 females, and 6 of sex unknown) and 25 refused. Those who regarded research to improve health care as important were 76.7% of those sampled. Only 28 patients (5.0%) answered that they would not permit the use of their residual blood for research purposes. Although logistic analysis did not detect significant factors influencing the giving of permission, the percentage who would not permit the use of their residual blood for research purposes was significantly higher in cancer outpatients (6.7%) than in inpatients (1.0%). It seems desirable for hospitals to establish an open policy concerning residual blood use for research purposes.

摘要

为了记录患者对于将剩余血液用于研究目的的看法,1997年10月在爱知癌症中心医院进行了一项问卷调查。研究对象为在研究登记当周的周一至周五上午于中心采血室接受过血液检测的患者。问卷在采血室前的等候区发放并回收。在我们试图发放问卷的583名患者中,558名参与了调查(258名男性,294名女性,6名性别未知),25名拒绝参与。认为改善医疗保健的研究很重要的患者占抽样患者的76.7%。只有28名患者(5.0%)回答他们不会允许将其剩余血液用于研究目的。虽然逻辑分析未发现影响给予许可的显著因素,但癌症门诊患者中不允许将其剩余血液用于研究目的的比例(6.7%)显著高于住院患者(1.0%)。医院似乎应就将剩余血液用于研究目的制定一项开放政策。

相似文献

1
Patients' views on residual blood use for research purposes.
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1998 Mar;89(3):341-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1998.tb00568.x.
2
Patients' expectations of information provided at cancer hospitals in Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;26(5):362-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jjco.a023246.
3
Patients' views on reference to clinical data.
J Epidemiol. 1997 Mar;7(1):17-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.7.17.
4
Informed consent in clinical practice: patients' experiences and perspectives following surgery.
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 9;8:765. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1754-z.
9
Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb 12;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-18.
10
Conducting a large, multi-site survey about patients' views on broad consent: challenges and solutions.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0263-7.

引用本文的文献

2
A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples.
Br J Cancer. 2009 Nov 3;101(9):1505-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605339. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
3
One-time general consent for research on biological samples.
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):544-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.544.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines on ethics for epidemiologists.
Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;19(1):226-9. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.1.226.
2
Patients' views on reference to clinical data.
J Epidemiol. 1997 Mar;7(1):17-9. doi: 10.2188/jea.7.17.
5
Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.
J Clin Oncol. 1996 May;14(5):1730-6; discussion 1737-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.5.1730.
7
Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials--are patients really informed?
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(7):907-10. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90111-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验