Suppr超能文献

[在专业框架内评估母羊体况评分方法实践的准确性]

[Assessing the accuracy of the practice of a method of scoring the body condition of ewes within a professional framework].

作者信息

Calavas D, Sulpice P, Lepetitcolin E, Bugnard F

机构信息

Centre d'écopathologie animale Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Vet Res. 1998 Mar-Apr;29(2):129-38.

PMID:9601145
Abstract

The accuracy of the body condition scoring for ewes using lumbar palpation was assessed by mean of an experiment conducted under conditions close to those occurring everyday on the farms. Thirteen operators evaluated the body condition score twice in a sample of 48 Lacaune breed dairy ewes, using a semi-quantitative grid (from 0 to 5 points, with a 0.25 point precision). Under the experimental conditions, the repeatability of the method, i.e. the comparison between the scores given by the same operator to the same animals for the two successive scoring notations, was good and even very good (Kappa test), if a 0.25 point precision is tolerated. On the other hand, the reproducibility, i.e. the comparison between the scores given to the same animals by differents operators was poor. Therefore, this method is easy to master for the management of a given flock by a single person. However in order to make comparisons between flocks, in reference to body condition standards set up for different farming systems, this method needs greater precision. Some of the application conditions required for this are discussed.

摘要

通过在接近农场日常情况的条件下进行的一项实验,评估了采用腰椎触诊法对母羊进行体况评分的准确性。13名操作人员使用半定量网格(从0到5分,精确到0.25分),对48只拉考讷品种奶用母羊的样本进行了两次体况评分。在实验条件下,如果允许0.25分的精度,该方法的重复性,即同一操作人员对同一批母羊连续两次评分的结果比较,良好甚至非常好(kappa检验)。另一方面,该方法的再现性,即不同操作人员对同一批母羊评分结果的比较,较差。因此,对于单人管理特定羊群而言,这种方法易于掌握。然而,为了参照针对不同养殖系统制定的体况标准在不同羊群之间进行比较,这种方法需要更高的精度。本文讨论了实现这一目标所需的一些应用条件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验