Suppr超能文献

芬太尼与吗啡对大鼠镇痛及肠道作用的比较。

Comparison of the analgesic and intestinal effects of fentanyl and morphine in rats.

作者信息

Megens A A, Artois K, Vermeire J, Meert T, Awouters F H

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998 Apr;15(4):253-7. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00371-0.

Abstract

Clinical studies report a low incidence of intestinal side effects with transdermally administered fentanyl (TTS-fentanyl) in comparison with oral morphine. To support these clinical data, analgesic and intestinal effects of both opioids were compared in rats. After subcutaneous injection, analgesia in the tail withdrawal reaction test was obtained at a peak effect dose of 0.032 mg/kg with fentanyl and 8.0 mg/kg with morphine. This analgesic dose exceeded the ED50 for inhibition of castor oil-induced diarrhea only slightly (1.1 x) in the case of fentanyl (0.028 mg/kg) but markedly (36 x) in the case of morphine (0.22 mg/kg). To reverse completely the antidiarrheal effect of equivalent analgesic doses of the opioids (their ED50S for analgesia lasting 2 hours), much more naloxone was required in the case of morphine (5.4 mg/kg) than in the case of fentanyl (0.19 mg/kg). After oral administration, the difference between both opioids was less pronounced. Analgesia was obtained at 0.85 mg/kg with fentanyl and 32 mg/kg with morphine. This analgesic dose only slightly (1.7 x) exceeded the antidiarrheal dose in the case of fentanyl (0.49 mg/kg) but significantly (6.2 x) in the case of morphine (5.2 mg/ kg). To reverse completely the antidiarrheal effect of equivalent analgesic oral doses of the opioids (their ED50S for analgesia lasting 2 hours), more naloxone was required in the case of morphine (11 mg/kg) than in the case of fentanyl (2.0 mg/kg). Rapid penetration of fentanyl into the brain is thought to be responsible for small dissociation between the analgesic and intestinal effect of this lipophilic opioid. The present data provide preclinical evidence to support the relatively low incidence of intestinal side effects observed clinically with the use of TTS-fentanyl in comparison with orally administered morphine.

摘要

临床研究报告称,与口服吗啡相比,经皮给药芬太尼(透皮芬太尼)引起肠道副作用的发生率较低。为了支持这些临床数据,在大鼠中比较了两种阿片类药物的镇痛和肠道效应。皮下注射后,在甩尾反应试验中,芬太尼的峰值效应剂量为0.032mg/kg,吗啡为8.0mg/kg时可获得镇痛效果。该镇痛剂量仅略高于(1.1倍)芬太尼(0.028mg/kg)抑制蓖麻油诱导腹泻的半数有效剂量(ED50),但显著高于(36倍)吗啡(0.22mg/kg)的ED50。为了完全逆转等效镇痛剂量的阿片类药物(其镇痛ED50持续2小时)的止泻作用,吗啡(5.4mg/kg)比芬太尼(0.19mg/kg)需要更多的纳洛酮。口服给药后,两种阿片类药物之间的差异不太明显。芬太尼0.85mg/kg、吗啡32mg/kg时可获得镇痛效果。该镇痛剂量仅略高于(1.7倍)芬太尼(0.49mg/kg)的止泻剂量,但显著高于(6.2倍)吗啡(5.2mg/kg)的止泻剂量。为了完全逆转等效口服镇痛剂量的阿片类药物(其镇痛ED50持续2小时)的止泻作用,吗啡(11mg/kg)比芬太尼(2.0mg/kg)需要更多的纳洛酮。芬太尼迅速渗透到大脑中被认为是这种亲脂性阿片类药物镇痛和肠道效应之间解离较小的原因。目前的数据提供了临床前证据,以支持与口服吗啡相比,临床使用透皮芬太尼时观察到的肠道副作用发生率相对较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验