• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Tanphiphat C, Tanprayoon T, Sangsubhan C, Chatamra K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1998 Jun;12(6):846-51. doi: 10.1007/s004649900727.

DOI:10.1007/s004649900727
PMID:9602004
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is controversial. The aim of this study was to find out whether it is justified to switch from the predominantly modified Bassini repair which the authors had been using to laparoscopic repair.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial in 120 eligible patients admitted for elective hernia repair in a university hospital.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair; the other 60 patients had an open repair, mostly with the modified Bassini technique. Operative time for laparoscopic repair was significantly longer, mean (s.d.) 95 (28) min vs 67 (27) min (p < 0.001). The mean analogue pain score during the first 24 h after surgery was 36.2 (20.2) in the laparoscopic group and 49.3 (24.9) in the open group (p = 0.006). The requirement for narcotic injections and postoperative disability in walking 10 m and getting out of bed were also significantly less following laparoscopic repair. The postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different, mean 2.6 (1.2) days for laparoscopic repair and 3.0 (1.5) days for open repair (p = 0.1). Patients were able to perform light activities without pain or discomfort sooner after laparoscopic repair, median interquartile range 8 (5-14) days vs 14 (8-19) days (p = 0.013). Patients also resumed heavy activities sooner, but not significantly, after laparoscopic repair, median 28 (17-60) days vs 35 (20-56) days (p = 0.25). The return to work was not significantly different, median 14 (8-25) days after laparoscopic repair and 15 (11-21) days after open repair (p = 0.14). After a mean follow-up of 32 months one patient developed a recurrent hernia 3 months after a laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic repair was more costly than open repair by approximately $400.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with less early postoperative pain and disability and earlier return to full activities than open repair, but there were no benefits regarding postoperative hospital stay and return to work; laparoscopic repair was also more costly.

摘要

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial.
Surg Endosc. 1998 Jun;12(6):846-51. doi: 10.1007/s004649900727.
2
Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial.原发性腹股沟疝的巴西尼修补术与腹腔镜修补术对比:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Surg. 1998 Jun;164(6):439-47. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004256.
3
Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia.腹腔镜(经腹腹膜前)与开放(补片)修补术治疗双侧及复发性腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机试验
Surg Endosc. 2003 Sep;17(9):1386-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9223-x. Epub 2003 Jun 17.
4
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
5
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial.开放或腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝?一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Apr;13(4):323-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649900981.
7
Postoperative hypoesthesia and pain: qualitative assessment after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.术后感觉减退与疼痛:开放及腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的定性评估
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):129-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9388-4. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
8
Comparison of postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial study.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein无张力腹股沟疝修补术后短期并发症的比较:一项随机试验研究
Minerva Chir. 2015 Apr;70(2):83-9. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
9
Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝的随机对照试验:结果与成本
BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):103-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103.
10
Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.
Lancet. 1994 May 21;343(8908):1243-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92148-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of surgical quality indicators after certification as a Hernia Center.疝中心认证后手术质量指标分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):255-264. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01449-z. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system.退伍军人事务系统中开放、腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝修补术的趋势和结果。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):889-899. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02419-3. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Effect of Patient Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgical Ergonomics.
患者体重指数对腹腔镜手术人体工程学的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jun;29(6):1709-1713. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03748-0.
4
Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Open Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术与开放修补术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝的Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4288-9.
5
Concurrent hydrocelectomy during inguinal herniorrhaphy is a risk factor for complications and reoperation: data from rural Haiti.腹股沟疝修补术中同期行鞘膜积液切除术是并发症和再次手术的危险因素:来自海地农村的数据。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1636-5. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?哪种手术方式造成的人体工程学压力更大:腹腔镜手术还是开放手术?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3286-3290. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5360-5. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
Assessment of systemic inflammatory response after total extraperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia.腹股沟疝完全腹膜外修补术和Lichtenstein修补术后全身炎症反应的评估。
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1543-1. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
8
Raising the quality of hernia care: Is there a need?提高疝气护理质量:有必要吗?
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2061-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4309-4. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Hospital costs associated with laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy.与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和开放腹股沟疝修补术相关的医院费用。
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00217.
10
EAES Consensus Development Conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias.欧洲内镜外科学会腹股沟疝内镜修补术共识发展会议
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3505-19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3001-9. Epub 2013 May 25.