• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性腹股沟疝的巴西尼修补术与腹腔镜修补术对比:一项随机对照试验

Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Dirksen C D, Beets G L, Go P M, Geisler F E, Baeten C G, Kootstra G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 1998 Jun;164(6):439-47. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004256.

DOI:10.1080/110241598750004256
PMID:9696445
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of open and laparoscopic primary inguinal hernia repair.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital, The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

87 patients had 103 open repairs and 88 patients had 114 laparoscopic repairs between November 1993 and July 1995.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic repair by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique and open repair by the Bassini technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Recurrence, morbidity, pain, and duration of convalescence.

RESULTS

Operating time was longer for laparoscopy (mean (SD): 82 (28) compared with 45 (15) minutes p < 0.001). Patients in the Bassini group had higher postoperative pain scores (mean (SD)VAS: 2.9 (1.6) compared with 2.0 (1.6) p=0.002), used more analgesics (median total intake: 2 (0-54) compared with 0 tablets (0-42) p=0.008), and needed a longer convalescence time (mean (SD) time to return to work: 22 (12.6) compared with 14 (10.1) days p < 0.001; mean (SD) time to return to physical activities: 27 (12.6) compared with 17 (12.2) days p < 0.001). Mean follow up was 24 months. Recurrence rates were 21% (22/ 103) after Bassini and 6% (7/114) after laparoscopic repair (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic hernia repair is a safe operation, which has obvious advantages over the Bassini repair in terms of pain, use of analgesic drugs, resumption of activities, and recurrence. A disadvantage of the laparoscopic repair is the longer operating time.

摘要

目的

比较开放式与腹腔镜下原发性腹股沟疝修补术的疗效。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

荷兰的大学医院。

研究对象

1993年11月至1995年7月期间,87例患者接受了开放修补术103次,88例患者接受了腹腔镜修补术114次。

干预措施

经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜修补术和Bassini开放式修补术。

主要观察指标

复发率、发病率、疼痛及康复时间。

结果

腹腔镜手术时间更长(平均值(标准差):82(28)分钟,而开放式手术为45(15)分钟;p<0.001)。Bassini组患者术后疼痛评分更高(平均值(标准差)视觉模拟评分法(VAS):2.9(1.6),而腹腔镜组为2.0(1.6);p=0.002),使用更多镇痛药(中位数总摄入量:2(0-54)片,而腹腔镜组为0片(0-42);p=0.008),康复时间更长(平均(标准差)恢复工作时间:22(12.6)天,而腹腔镜组为14(10.1)天;p<0.001;平均(标准差)恢复体力活动时间:27(12.6)天,而腹腔镜组为17(12.2)天;p<​0.001)。平均随访时间为24个月。Bassini术后复发率为21%(22/103),腹腔镜修补术后复发率为6%(7/114)(p=0.001)。

结论

腹腔镜疝修补术是一种安全的手术,在疼痛、镇痛药使用、活动恢复及复发方面比Bassini修补术具有明显优势。腹腔镜修补术的一个缺点是手术时间更长。

相似文献

1
Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial.原发性腹股沟疝的巴西尼修补术与腹腔镜修补术对比:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Surg. 1998 Jun;164(6):439-47. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004256.
2
Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术与开放式李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8575-6. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
3
Tension-free repair versus Bassini technique for strangulated inguinal hernia: A controlled randomized study.无张力修补术与巴西尼技术治疗绞窄性腹股沟疝的对照随机研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Aug;6(4):302-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 May 2.
4
Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised trial.腹腔镜与开放腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1998;87(1):22-5.
5
Hernioplasty and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study of open tension-free versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.疝修补术与同期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:开放无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的前瞻性随机研究
Surgery. 2001 May;129(5):530-6. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.112962.
6
[Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair].[无张力腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术]
Minerva Chir. 2004 Aug;59(4):369-77.
7
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 1999 Mar;86(3):316-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01053.x.
8
[Open mesh technique versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach in inguinal hernia repair. Our experience].[开放网片技术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)入路在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。我们的经验]
G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):497-504.
9
Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中疼痛的量化显示了不同假体固定系统之间的显著差异。
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.013.
10
Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs.四臂随机临床试验比较腹腔镜疝修补术与开放疝修补术。
Int J Surg. 2010;8(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in Caucasian patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.白种人患者机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(10):885. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2126.
2
Transabdominal preperitoneal repair for an adolescent patient with Hunter syndrome: a case report.经腹腹膜前修补术治疗一名患有亨特综合征的青少年患者:病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2019 May 31;5(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40792-019-0645-2.
3
Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study.
安大略省腹股沟疝复发的再次手术:一项基于人群的研究。
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1822-0. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
4
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Open Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术与开放修补术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝的Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4288-9.
6
Concurrent hydrocelectomy during inguinal herniorrhaphy is a risk factor for complications and reoperation: data from rural Haiti.腹股沟疝修补术中同期行鞘膜积液切除术是并发症和再次手术的危险因素:来自海地农村的数据。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1636-5. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Mesh Removal and Selective Neurectomy for Persistent Groin Pain Following Lichtenstein Repair.针对Lichtenstein修补术后持续性腹股沟疼痛的补片移除与选择性神经切除术
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):701-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3780-y.
8
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
9
Laparoscopic repair of recurrent groin hernia: results of a prospective study.腹腔镜修复复发性腹股沟疝:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):734-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0048-0. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
10
Analysis of post-surgical pain after inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study of 1,440 operations.腹股沟疝修补术后手术疼痛分析:一项对1440例手术的前瞻性研究。
Hernia. 2007 Dec;11(6):517-25. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0267-7. Epub 2007 Jul 24.