• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极早早产儿死亡率与发育障碍的定量综述。

A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns.

作者信息

Lorenz J M, Wooliever D E, Jetton J R, Paneth N

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):425-35. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.425.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.152.5.425
PMID:9605024
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the literature on mortality rates and prevalences of major neurodevelopmental disabilities and to examine trends of these outcomes over time in extremely premature neonates.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE was used to search the English literature for studies published since 1970 reporting on both mortality and disability in infants born at or before 26 weeks' gestation (extremely immature [EI] cohort), with a birth weight of 800 g or less (extremely small [ES] cohort), or subgroups of these.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included in the analysis if all of the following were reported: mortality; direct examination of 75% or more of the survivors; and the proportion of patients with at least 1 of the following disabilities: cerebral palsy, mental retardation, blindness, and deafness. Studies reporting cohorts included as a subset of cohorts in another study were excluded. Forty-two studies providing mortality and disability data for 20 cohorts of 4116 EI infants and 38 cohorts of 4345 ES infants born after 1972 met the inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted from all studies that met these criteria by two of us (J.M.L. and D.E.W.), independently; the data were then cross-checked to ensure accuracy.

RESULTS

Survival averaged 41% for EI infants and 30% for ES infants, and it increased significantly with time. In contrast to mortality, the prevalences of major neurodevelopmental disabilities among survivors have not changed over time. The most common major disability was mental retardation, found in 14% of EI and ES survivors. Cerebral palsy was found in 12% of EI survivors and 8% of ES survivors, blindness was found in 8% of EI and ES survivors, and deafness was found in 3% of EI and ES survivors. Overall, 22% of EI survivors and 24% of ES survivors were classified as having at least 1 major disability. Each 100 EI or ES livebirths yielded 7 children with major disabilities; this prevalence was correlated with survival across cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of disabilities had not changed among EI or ES survivors with increasing survival. However, increasing survival of these infants has resulted in a steadily increasing prevalence of children with disabilities.

摘要

目的

总结关于主要神经发育障碍的死亡率和患病率的文献,并研究极早产儿中这些结果随时间的变化趋势。

数据来源

使用MEDLINE检索自1970年以来发表的英文文献,这些研究报告了妊娠26周及以前出生的婴儿(极不成熟[EI]队列)、出生体重800克及以下的婴儿(极小[ES]队列)或这些亚组的死亡率和残疾情况。

研究选择

如果报告了以下所有内容,则将研究纳入分析:死亡率;对75%或更多幸存者进行直接检查;以及患有以下至少一种残疾的患者比例:脑瘫、智力迟钝、失明和失聪。排除将所报告队列作为另一项研究中队列子集的研究。42项研究提供了1972年后出生的20个EI队列的4116名婴儿和38个ES队列的4345名婴儿的死亡率和残疾数据,符合纳入标准。

数据提取

由我们两人(J.M.L.和D.E.W.)独立从所有符合这些标准的研究中提取数据;然后对数据进行交叉核对以确保准确性。

结果

EI婴儿的平均存活率为41%,ES婴儿为30%,且随时间显著增加。与死亡率相反,幸存者中主要神经发育障碍的患病率并未随时间变化。最常见的主要残疾是智力迟钝,在EI和ES幸存者中占14%。EI幸存者中12%患有脑瘫,ES幸存者中8%患有脑瘫;EI和ES幸存者中8%失明;EI和ES幸存者中3%失聪。总体而言,22%的EI幸存者和24%的ES幸存者被归类为患有至少一种主要残疾。每100例EI或ES活产中有7名儿童患有主要残疾;这种患病率与各队列的存活率相关。

结论

随着存活率的提高,EI或ES幸存者中的残疾患病率并未改变。然而,这些婴儿存活率的提高导致残疾儿童的患病率稳步上升。

相似文献

1
A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns.极早早产儿死亡率与发育障碍的定量综述。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):425-35. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.425.
2
The outcome of extreme prematurity.
Semin Perinatol. 2001 Oct;25(5):348-59. doi: 10.1053/sper.2001.27164.
3
Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.2011年法国妊娠22至34周出生的早产儿2岁时的神经发育结局:EPIPAGE-2队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Aug 16;358:j3448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3448.
4
Before viability: a geographically based outcome study of infants weighing 500 grams or less at birth.出生前存活能力:一项针对出生时体重500克或以下婴儿的基于地理位置的结局研究。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3 Pt 1):438-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.438.
5
Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies.1995 年和 2006 年在英国出生的极早产儿的神经发育结局:EPICure 研究。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7961. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7961.
6
Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s.20世纪90年代极低出生体重儿的存活率提高,但神经发育残疾发生率增加。
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):997-1003. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0221.
7
Changing long-term outcomes for infants 500-999 g birth weight in Victoria, 1979-2005.改变维多利亚州 1979-2005 年间 500-999 克出生体重婴儿的长期结局。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Nov;96(6):F443-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.200576. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
8
Survival and neurodevelopmental outcome of ELBW children at 5 years of age: comparison of two cohorts born 10 years apart.极低出生体重儿 5 岁时的生存和神经发育结局:相隔 10 年出生的两批患儿的比较。
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jul;101(7):714-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02645.x. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
9
Survival and developmental disability in infants with birth weights of 501 to 800 grams, born between 1979 and 1994.
Pediatrics. 1997 Dec;100(6):982-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.6.982.
10
Improved outcome into the 1990s for infants weighing 500-999 g at birth. The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group.20世纪90年代出生体重在500 - 999克的婴儿预后得到改善。维多利亚婴儿协作研究小组。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Sep;77(2):F91-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality from external causes in late adolescence and early adulthood by gestational age and sex: a population-based cohort study in four Nordic countries.北欧四国基于人群的队列研究:按胎龄和性别划分的青少年晚期和成年早期的外部原因死亡率。
BMC Med. 2024 Nov 4;22(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03731-2.
2
An Animal Model of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Exposure to Light and Sound in the Preterm Infant.早产儿新生儿重症监护病房光照和声音暴露的动物模型。
Integr Comp Biol. 2023 Sep 15;63(3):585-596. doi: 10.1093/icb/icad020.
3
Gestational Age, Parent Education, and Education in Adulthood.
胎龄、父母受教育程度与成年后的受教育程度。
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051959.
4
A Model of Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage in Preterm Rat Pups.早产大鼠幼崽生发基质出血模型
Front Cell Neurosci. 2020 Dec 3;14:535320. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.535320. eCollection 2020.
5
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 42 Months After Thyroxine Supplementation in Infants Below 28 Weeks' Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.28 周以下早产儿甲状腺素补充治疗后 42 个月的神经发育结局:一项随机对照试验。
Thyroid. 2020 Jul;30(7):948-954. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0293. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Prevalence of Low Birth Weight and Prematurity and Associated Factors in Neonates in Ethiopia: Results from a Hospital-based Observational Study.埃塞俄比亚新生儿低出生体重和早产的患病率及相关因素:一项基于医院的观察性研究结果
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 Nov;29(6):677-688. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i6.4.
7
Co-occurrence and Severity of Neurodevelopmental Burden (Cognitive Impairment, Cerebral Palsy, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Epilepsy) at Age Ten Years in Children Born Extremely Preterm.极早产儿十岁时神经发育负担(认知障碍、脑瘫、自闭症谱系障碍和癫痫)的共病和严重程度。
Pediatr Neurol. 2018 Feb;79:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Therapeutic effects of L-Cysteine in newborn mice subjected to hypoxia-ischemia brain injury via the CBS/HS system: Role of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress.L-半胱氨酸通过CBS/HS系统对缺氧缺血性脑损伤新生小鼠的治疗作用:氧化应激和内质网应激的作用
Redox Biol. 2017 Oct;13:528-540. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Advanced neuroimaging and its role in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants.先进的神经影像学及其在预测极早产儿神经发育结局中的作用。
Semin Perinatol. 2016 Dec;40(8):530-541. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
Head Lag in Infancy: What Is It Telling Us?婴儿期的头后仰:它在向我们传达什么?
Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;70(1):7001220010p1-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.017558.