Barclay T S, Tsourounis C, McCart G M
School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco 94143, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 1998 May;32(5):574-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.17235.
To review the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of glucosamine and critically evaluate currently available literature regarding its safety and efficacy.
A MEDLINE search was conducted between January 1965 and May 1997. Key words used in the search were osteoarthritis, osteoarthrosis, gonarthrosis, and glucosamine. In addition, references cited in articles obtained from the MEDLINE search were reviewed for additional literature.
All articles were considered for inclusion in the review. Articles were excluded from critical evaluation for lack of randomization, lack of a control group, 30 or fewer study participants, inconsistent treatment regimen, incomplete dosing information, or incomplete reporting of results.
Osteoarthritis affects approximately 12% of the US population; the incidence increases with increasing age. Currently used pharmacologic treatments, including acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, do not slow or reverse the degenerative process in osteoarthritis. Glucosamine has recently received a great deal of attention from the public as a potential treatment of osteoarthritis, prompting healthcare professionals to investigate its clinical usefulness and potential for adverse effects. The drug has been proposed to stop and possibly reverse the degenerative process in osteoarthritis. Following absorption of an oral dose, glucosamine is incorporated into plasma proteins during first-pass metabolism, resulting in 26% bioavailability. Unbound glucosamine is concentrated in the articular cartilage. Each of the three critically evaluated studies reported a decrease in the symptoms of osteoarthritis (e.g., decreased Lequesne index, decreased pain severity, increased range of motion) for the glucosamine group, which was greater than that obtained in the control group. Flaws in study design, however, prevent the use of these results in modifying current clinical practice. Reported short-term adverse effects include mild gastrointestinal problems, drowsiness, skin reactions, and headache.
Improvement in the symptoms of osteoarthritis associated with the use of glucosamine has been observed in clinical trials; however, those trials have flaws in design and data analysis. Further research needs to be conducted before glucosamine can be recommended as a treatment for osteoarthritis.
综述氨基葡萄糖的药理学和药代动力学,并严格评估目前有关其安全性和有效性的文献。
1965年1月至1997年5月进行了MEDLINE检索。检索中使用的关键词为骨关节炎、骨关节病、膝关节炎和氨基葡萄糖。此外,还对从MEDLINE检索中获得的文章中引用的参考文献进行了审查以获取更多文献。
所有文章均被考虑纳入综述。因缺乏随机化、缺乏对照组、研究参与者30名或更少、治疗方案不一致、给药信息不完整或结果报告不完整而被排除在严格评估之外。
骨关节炎影响约12%的美国人口;发病率随年龄增长而增加。目前使用的药物治疗,包括对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药,不能减缓或逆转骨关节炎的退行性过程。氨基葡萄糖最近作为骨关节炎的一种潜在治疗方法受到公众的广泛关注,促使医疗保健专业人员研究其临床效用和不良反应的可能性。有人提出该药物可阻止并可能逆转骨关节炎的退行性过程。口服一剂后,氨基葡萄糖在首过代谢过程中被纳入血浆蛋白,导致生物利用度为26%。未结合的氨基葡萄糖集中在关节软骨中。三项经过严格评估的研究均报告,氨基葡萄糖组骨关节炎症状有所减轻(如Lequesne指数降低、疼痛严重程度降低、活动范围增加),且大于对照组。然而,研究设计中的缺陷使得这些结果无法用于改变当前的临床实践。报告的短期不良反应包括轻度胃肠道问题、嗜睡、皮肤反应和头痛。
在临床试验中观察到使用氨基葡萄糖与骨关节炎症状改善有关;然而,这些试验在设计和数据分析方面存在缺陷。在氨基葡萄糖可被推荐用于治疗骨关节炎之前,需要进行进一步的研究。