Sweeney R, Bale R, Vogele M, Nevinny-Stickel M, Bluhm A, Auer T, Hessenberger G, Lukas P
Department of Radiotherapy-Radiooncology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 May 1;41(2):475-83. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00064-9.
To compare accuracy, clinical feasibility, and subjective patient impression between a noninvasive head holder (Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH]; Wellhoefer Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) developed at the University of Innsbruck and the thermoplastic mask fixation system for use in fractionated external radiotherapy. We present a case report of an actual patient fixated in the VBH head holder during radiation therapy.
The VBH head holder consists of an individualized vacuum dental cast connected to a head plate via two hydraulic arms allowing noninvasive, reproducible head fixation of even uncooperative patients. Accuracy was tested and compared with that of the thermoplastic mask using the Phillips EasyGuide navigation system on five volunteers. Specific external registration points served as landmarks and their positions were compared after each repositioning. System and operator inaccuracy were also taken into account. The times taken for production and repositioning of the respective fixation devices were compared, and subjective impressions were noted.
Mean VBH head holder repositioning accuracy was 1.02 mm while that of the thermoplastic mask was 3.05 mm. 69% of mask repositionings showed a deviation > 2 mm and 41% > 3 mm (as opposed to 8% and 1% respectively for the VBH head holder) Those points located farthest away from the respective plane of fixation showed the largest deviations. Both production and repositioning times were similar between the systems; depending upon the patient, the VBH head holder was generally better tolerated than the mask system.
Due to its significantly better repositioning accuracy compared to that of the thermoplastic mask, the VBH head holder is especially suited for external radiation requiring precise repositioning due to critical tissues in immediate surrounding of the area to be irradiated.
比较因斯布鲁克大学研发的一种无创头部固定器(Vogele Bale Hohner [VBH];德国施瓦岑布鲁克的Wellhoefer剂量测定公司)与用于分次体外放射治疗的热塑性面罩固定系统在准确性、临床可行性及患者主观感受方面的差异。我们呈现了一例在放射治疗期间使用VBH头部固定器固定的实际患者的病例报告。
VBH头部固定器由一个个性化的真空牙模组成,通过两个液压臂连接到一个头板,可实现对不配合患者的无创、可重复的头部固定。使用飞利浦EasyGuide导航系统在五名志愿者身上测试并比较其与热塑性面罩的准确性。特定的外部注册点作为地标,每次重新定位后比较它们的位置。同时考虑系统和操作人员的不准确性。比较了各自固定装置的制作和重新定位所需时间,并记录主观感受。
VBH头部固定器的平均重新定位准确性为1.02毫米,而热塑性面罩为3.05毫米。69%的面罩重新定位偏差>2毫米,41%>3毫米(相比之下,VBH头部固定器分别为8%和1%)。那些距离各自固定平面最远的点偏差最大。两个系统的制作和重新定位时间相似;根据患者情况,VBH头部固定器通常比面罩系统耐受性更好。
由于与热塑性面罩相比,VBH头部固定器的重新定位准确性明显更高,因此它特别适用于因待照射区域紧邻关键组织而需要精确重新定位的体外放射治疗。