van der Windt D A, van der Heijden G J, de Winter A F, Koes B W, Devillé W, Bouter L M
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Feb;57(2):82-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.2.82.
To evaluate the responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ).
The study was conducted within the framework of an observational study on shoulder disorders in primary care. After first presentation of their complaints to the general practitioner and after one and six months, participants completed the SDQ, a single question on functional status (FSQ), and an ordinal 11 point scale for the severity of pain (PSS). Responsiveness of the SDQ was evaluated compared with that of the FSQ and PSS, by calculating responsiveness ratios and by plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Recovery according to the patient was used as an external criterion for clinically relevant improvement (complete recovery or much improved on a six point Likert scale was denoted as clinically relevant improvement).
A total of 349 consecutive patients with shoulder disorders were enrolled in the observational study. Response rates ranged between 96% and 89%. Responsiveness ratios were slightly higher for the PSS compared with the SDQ (2.53 versus 2.22 at one month, 2.24 versus 1.89 at six months). The area under the ROC curve was 0.84 for both the SDQ and the PSS, and 0.72 for the FSQ.
The results of this study confirm the responsiveness of the SDQ, making it a useful instrument to assess functional disability in longitudinal studies.
评估肩部功能障碍问卷(SDQ)的反应度。
本研究在一项关于初级保健中肩部疾病的观察性研究框架内进行。参与者在首次向全科医生诉说其症状后,以及在1个月和6个月后,完成SDQ、一个关于功能状态的单项问题(FSQ),以及一个用于评估疼痛严重程度的11级序贯量表(PSS)。通过计算反应度比率和绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,将SDQ的反应度与FSQ和PSS的反应度进行比较评估。根据患者自身判断的恢复情况被用作临床相关改善的外部标准(在六点李克特量表上完全恢复或显著改善被视为临床相关改善)。
共有349例连续的肩部疾病患者纳入了该观察性研究。应答率在96%至89%之间。与SDQ相比,PSS的反应度比率略高(1个月时为2.53对2.22,6个月时为2.24对1.89)。SDQ和PSS的ROC曲线下面积均为0.84,FSQ为0.72。
本研究结果证实了SDQ的反应度,使其成为纵向研究中评估功能障碍的有用工具。