Müller F M, Werner K E, Kasai M, Francesconi A, Chanock S J, Walsh T J
Immunocompromised Host Section, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1625-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1625-1629.1998.
Current methods of DNA extraction from different fungal pathogens are often time-consuming and require the use of toxic chemicals. DNA isolation from some fungal organisms is difficult due to cell walls or capsules that are not readily susceptible to lysis. We therefore investigated a new and rapid DNA isolation method using high-speed cell disruption (HSCD) incorporating chaotropic reagents and lysing matrices in comparison to standard phenol-chloroform (PC) extraction protocols for isolation of DNA from three medically important yeasts (Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Trichosporon beigelii) and two filamentous fungi (Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium solani). Additional extractions by HSCD were performed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pseudallescheria boydii, and Rhizopus arrhizus. Two different inocula (10(8) and 10(7) CFU) were compared for optimization of obtained yields. The entire extraction procedure was performed on as many as 12 samples within 1 h compared to 6 h for PC extraction. In comparison to the PC procedure, HSCD DNA extraction demonstrated significantly greater yields for 10(8) CFU of C. albicans, T. beigelii, A. fumigatus, and F. solani (P < or = 0.005), 10(7) CFU of C. neoformans (P < or = 0.05), and 10(7) CFU of A. fumigatus (P < or = 0.01). Yields were within the same range for 10(8) CFU of C. neoformans and l0(7) CFU of C. albicans for both HSCD extraction and PC extraction. For 10(7) CFU of T. beigelii, PC extraction resulted in a greater yield than did HSCD (P < or = 0.05). Yields obtained from 10(8) and 10(7) CFU were significantly greater for filamentous fungi than for yeasts by the HSCD extraction procedure (P < 0.0001). By the PC extraction procedure, differences were not significant. For all eight organisms, the rapid extraction procedure resulted in good yield, integrity, and quality of DNA as demonstrated by restriction fragment length polymorphism, PCR, and random amplified polymorphic DNA. We conclude that mechanical disruption of fungal cells by HSCD is a safe, rapid, and efficient procedure for extracting genomic DNA from medically important yeasts and especially from filamentous fungi.
目前从不同真菌病原体中提取DNA的方法通常耗时较长,且需要使用有毒化学物质。由于某些真菌的细胞壁或荚膜不易被裂解,从这些真菌生物体中分离DNA很困难。因此,我们研究了一种新的快速DNA分离方法,即使用结合了离液剂和裂解基质的高速细胞破碎(HSCD)法,并将其与标准的苯酚-氯仿(PC)提取方案进行比较,用于从三种具有医学重要性的酵母(白色念珠菌、新型隐球菌和贝氏丝孢酵母)和两种丝状真菌(烟曲霉和茄病镰刀菌)中分离DNA。还对酿酒酵母、博伊德假阿利什霉和少根根霉进行了HSCD额外提取。比较了两种不同接种量(10⁸和10⁷CFU)以优化获得的产量。整个提取过程在1小时内可处理多达12个样品,而PC提取则需要6小时。与PC方法相比,HSCD DNA提取对于白色念珠菌、贝氏丝孢酵母、烟曲霉和茄病镰刀菌的10⁸CFU(P≤0.005)、新型隐球菌的10⁷CFU(P≤0.05)以及烟曲霉的10⁷CFU(P≤0.01),产量显著更高。对于新型隐球菌的10⁸CFU和白色念珠菌的10⁷CFU,HSCD提取和PC提取的产量在同一范围内。对于贝氏丝孢酵母的10⁷CFU,PC提取的产量高于HSCD(P≤0.05)。通过HSCD提取程序,丝状真菌从10⁸和10⁷CFU获得的产量显著高于酵母(P<0.0001)。通过PC提取程序,差异不显著。对于所有八种生物体,快速提取程序都能获得产量良好、完整性和质量良好的DNA,这通过限制性片段长度多态性、PCR和随机扩增多态性DNA得以证明。我们得出结论,通过HSCD对真菌细胞进行机械破碎是一种从具有医学重要性的酵母尤其是丝状真菌中提取基因组DNA的安全、快速且高效的方法。