Suppr超能文献

[溃疡性结肠炎的手术选择]

[Surgical options in ulcerative colitis].

作者信息

Hultén L, Ecker K W

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(4):368-74.

PMID:9622896
Abstract

Surgery is needed in every second patient with pancolitis. Historically four surgical options have been developed: conventional ileostomy, ileorectostomy, continent ileostomy (Kock's pouch) and ileo-anal pouch. However, in emergent or unclear situations subtotal colectomy, ileostomy and preservation of the rectum is the most suitable operation. After recovery and in elective indications proctectomy and proctocolectomy establish the general surgical standard. Today, in most cases ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis is performed instead of creation of an ileostomy. Both lowered frequency of defecation and acceptable continence contribute to a better quality of life. However, functional disturbances are not uncommon and result in most cases from complications of the demanding technique. Definitive cure of the colitis is in interference with the risk of pouchitis in about 30%. The cumulative probability to loose the pouch may rise to 15-20% in the long-term course. Thus, ileorectostomy may be considered as a first step of surgical treatment, since pelvic nerve damage is excluded, function is much better and persistent proctitis can be treated topically. The attractively is that ileo-anal pouch can be performed later on, when decreasing function and increasing risk of malignant change will eventually require proctectomy. A Kock-pouch is seldom considered, especially in patients with ileostomy wishing sure fecal control. But the continent reservoir becomes more and more interesting again since it can be reconstructed from a failed ileo-anal pouch without loss of bowel. Conventional ileostomy should be reserved for patients not suitable for reconstructive methods or those who consider pough operations risk. However, it is the safest procedure with absolute cure of disease. The optimal choice of method considers medical and surgical aspects as well as patients conception and desire.

摘要

每两名全结肠炎患者中就有一人需要进行手术。从历史上看,已经开发出四种手术选择:传统回肠造口术、回肠直肠吻合术、可控性回肠造口术(科克袋)和回肠肛管袋。然而,在紧急或情况不明时,结肠次全切除术、回肠造口术并保留直肠是最合适的手术。恢复后,在择期情况下,直肠切除术和直肠结肠切除术确立了一般外科标准。如今,在大多数情况下,会进行回肠肛管吻合术而不是造回肠造口。排便频率降低和可接受的控便能力都有助于提高生活质量。然而,功能障碍并不少见,大多数情况下是由这种复杂技术的并发症导致的。结肠炎的彻底治愈与约30%的袋炎风险相关。从长期来看,失去袋的累积概率可能会升至15% - 20%。因此,回肠直肠吻合术可被视为手术治疗的第一步,因为它不会导致盆腔神经损伤,功能更好,持续性直肠炎可以进行局部治疗。其吸引人之处在于,当功能下降和恶性病变风险增加最终需要进行直肠切除术时,可以稍后进行回肠肛管袋手术。很少考虑科克袋,尤其是对于希望确保粪便控制的回肠造口术患者。但可控性贮袋再次变得越来越有吸引力,因为它可以从失败的回肠肛管袋重建,而不会损失肠道。传统回肠造口术应保留给不适合重建方法的患者或那些认为袋手术有风险的患者。然而,这是最安全的手术,能绝对治愈疾病。方法的最佳选择要考虑医学和外科方面以及患者的观念和意愿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验