Well M, Naber K G, Kinzig-Schippers M, Sörgel F
Urologic Clinic, Klinikum St. Elisabeth Hospital, Straubing, Germany.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998 Apr;10(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00014-4.
In an open, randomised monocentric crossover study in six male and six female healthy volunteers, the urinary antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetics of enoxacin, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin were assessed. Urine was collected up to 6 days, and venous blood samples up to 12 h, after a single oral dose of 400 mg enoxacin, 400 mg norfloxacin and 500 mg ciprofloxacin. Enoxacin (250 mg/l) demonstrated the highest peak concentration (median) in the urine (0-6 h), followed by ciprofloxacin (237 mg/l) and norfloxacin (157 mg/l) as determined by the HPLC assay. The total amount (mean) excreted by the kidneys as parent drugs were as follows: enoxacin 54% of dose, ciprofloxacin 33% of dose, and norfloxacin 22% of dose. The mean plasma concentrations decreased from 1 to 4 h after administration for enoxacin from 1.9 to 1.4 mg/l, for ciprofloxacin from 2.0 to 0.8 mg/l and for norfloxacin from 1.3 to 0.5 mg/l. The antibacterial activity in urine was determined as urinary bactericidal titers (UBT), i.e. the highest 2-fold dilution of urine still bactericidal for the reference organism (E. coli ATCC 25,922) and for five uropathogens with minimal inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) concentrations ranging from highly susceptible to resistant cultured from the urine of patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTI). For the E. coli ATCC 25,922, the organism with the lowest MIC, median UBTs of ciprofloxacin were present for 4 days, decreasing from 1:512 to 1:2, that of enoxacin for 2 days, decreasing from 1:256 to 1:4, and that of norfloxacin for 2 days, decreasing from 1:128 to 1:2. For the five uropathogens (with increasing MICs: K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, E. coli (resistant to nalidixic acid), P. aeruginosa and E. faecalis), the UBTs decreased in general, according to MICs, demonstrating the same relations of UBTs for ciprofloxacin (highest) versus enoxacin (medium) versus norfloxacin (lowest) with one exception (P. mirabilis) for which norfloxacin showed higher UBTs than enoxacin. The minimal urinary bactericidal concentrations (MUBC), as derived from urinary concentrations, and UBTs showed a fairly wide inter- and intraindividual range and were generally higher than the corresponding MBCs as determined in Mueller Hinton broth. In conclusion, according to antibacterial activity in urine determined as UBTs, a single oral dose of ciprofloxacin (500 mg) generally resulted in the highest and longest-lasting UBTs followed by that of enoxacin (400 mg) and norfloxacin (400 mg). A dose of 400 mg enoxacin can be expected to be at least equivalent if not superior to that of 400 mg norfloxacin. Only enoxacin and ciprofloxacin exhibited urinary bactericidal activity against all test organisms up to 12 h in all individuals. Therefore, clinical comparison of enoxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated UTI could be worth testing.
在一项针对6名男性和6名女性健康志愿者的开放性、随机单中心交叉研究中,评估了依诺沙星、诺氟沙星和环丙沙星的尿液抗菌活性及药代动力学。单次口服400 mg依诺沙星、400 mg诺氟沙星和500 mg环丙沙星后,收集尿液长达6天,采集静脉血样长达12小时。通过高效液相色谱法测定,依诺沙星(250 mg/l)在尿液(0 - 6小时)中的峰值浓度(中位数)最高,其次是环丙沙星(237 mg/l)和诺氟沙星(157 mg/l)。肾脏以原形药物形式排泄的总量(平均值)如下:依诺沙星为给药剂量的54%,环丙沙星为给药剂量的33%,诺氟沙星为给药剂量的22%。给药后1至4小时,依诺沙星的平均血浆浓度从1.9 mg/l降至1.4 mg/l,环丙沙星从2.0 mg/l降至0.8 mg/l,诺氟沙星从1.3 mg/l降至0.5 mg/l。尿液中的抗菌活性通过尿液杀菌效价(UBT)来测定,即尿液对参考菌株(大肠埃希菌ATCC 25922)以及从复杂性尿路感染(UTI)患者尿液中培养出的5种尿路病原体(其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和杀菌浓度(MBC)范围从高度敏感到耐药)仍具有杀菌作用的最高2倍稀释度。对于大肠埃希菌ATCC 25922(MIC最低的菌株),环丙沙星的中位数UBT持续4天,从1:512降至1:2;依诺沙星持续2天,从1:256降至1:4;诺氟沙星持续2天,从1:128降至1:2。对于5种尿路病原体(MIC依次升高:肺炎克雷伯菌、奇异变形杆菌、对萘啶酸耐药的大肠埃希菌、铜绿假单胞菌和粪肠球菌),UBT总体上根据MIC降低,显示出环丙沙星(最高)、依诺沙星(中等)和诺氟沙星(最低)的UBT关系相同,但有一个例外(奇异变形杆菌),诺氟沙星的UBT高于依诺沙星。从尿液浓度得出的最低尿液杀菌浓度(MUBC)和UBT在个体间和个体内显示出相当大的范围,并且通常高于在 Mueller Hinton肉汤中测定的相应MBC。总之,根据以UBT测定的尿液抗菌活性,单次口服500 mg环丙沙星通常导致最高且持续时间最长的UBT,其次是400 mg依诺沙星和400 mg诺氟沙星。如果不比400 mg诺氟沙星更优,预计400 mg依诺沙星至少与之等效。只有依诺沙星和环丙沙星在所有个体中对所有测试菌株在长达12小时内均表现出尿液杀菌活性。因此,依诺沙星与环丙沙星在治疗复杂性UTI方面的临床比较可能值得进行测试。