• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次口服给药后,健康志愿者中加替沙星(400毫克)与环丙沙星(500毫克)的尿杀菌活性、尿排泄及血浆浓度比较

Urinary bactericidal activity, urinary excretion and plasma concentrations of gatifloxacin (400 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose.

作者信息

Boy Dieter, Well Michaela, Kinzig-Schippers Martina, Sörgel Fritz, Ankel-Fuchs Dorothe, Naber Kurt G

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hospital St Elisabeth, St Elisabeth-Str. 23, D-94315 Straubing, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Mar;23 Suppl 1:S6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.006
PMID:15037323
Abstract

In an open randomised double-crossover study 12 volunteers (six men, six women) received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg) to assess urinary bactericidal activity (in eight intervals up to 120 h) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (up to 36 h). Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion were determined by HPLC with fluorescence detection, and urinary bactericidal titers (UBT) by microdilution-method, using antibiotic-free urine of each volunteer. The mean maximum plasma concentration of gatifloxacin was 3.35 mg/l and that of ciprofloxacin 2.12 mg/l. The mean (median) cumulative renal excretion of the parent drug was for gatifloxacin 81 (83)% of the administered dose within 120 h and for ciprofloxacin 43 (45)%. The UBTs, i.e. the highest two-fold dilution (antibiotic-free urine as diluent) of urine still being bactericidal, were determined for an Escherichia coli ATCC reference strain and nine clinical uropathogens with the following MICs (mg/l) for gatifloxacin/ciprofloxacin (microdilution, MHB): E. coli ATCC 25922 (0.008/0.008); E. coli 523 (0.06/0.06); Klebsiella pneumoniae 1058 (0.03/0.016); Proteus mirabilis 524 (0.125/0.016); Pseudomonas aeruginosa 561 (1/0.125); Enterococcus faecalis strains 60 an 55 (0.5/1 and 8/32); Staphylococcus aureus strains 248 and 596 (both 0.03/0.125) and S. saprophyticus Ho94 (0.125/0.25). The median UBTs measured within the first 6h for gatifloxacin were between 1:16 and 1:>or=1024 for the Gram-negative strains including P. aeruginosa and between 1:8 and 1:>or=1024 for the five Gram-positive strains. The median UBTs for ciprofloxacin were between 1:64 and 1:>or=1024 for the Gram-negative strains (incl P. aeruginosa) and between 1:1.5 and 1:768 for the five Gram-positive strains. The UBTs up to 12 < 0.05 h showed no difference (P<0.05 ) for both E. coli strains, but ciprofloxacin was superior to gatifloxacin against Klebsiella, Proteus and Pseudomonas strains and gatifloxacin was superior to ciprofloxacin against all Gram-positive strains. For the UBTs at 12-24 h, gatifloxacin was generally superior to ciprofloxacin, but showed no difference in the Proteus and Pseudomonas strains. The areas under the UBT-time-curve (AUBT) up to 120 h showed statistically significant (P ) differences between both quinolones in favour of gatifloxacin against 8 of 10 strains tested, no difference for P. mirabilis and significantly higher activity of ciprofloxacin against P. aeruginosa. In conclusion, gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin had overall comparable initial urinary bactericidal activity with some differences for specific pathogens, some times in favour of gatifloxacin (Gram-positives) and some times of ciprofloxacin (usually Gram-negatives), suggesting that for empiric therapy a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400mg) would be clinically equivalent to ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice daily-in agreement with the results of a clinical study in complicated UTI performed previously [Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents (2004)].

摘要

在一项开放性随机双交叉研究中,12名志愿者(6名男性,6名女性)接受了单次口服加替沙星(400mg)或环丙沙星(500mg),以评估尿液杀菌活性(在长达120小时的8个时间间隔内)和药代动力学(PK)参数(长达36小时)。采用荧光检测的高效液相色谱法测定血浆浓度和尿排泄量,并使用每位志愿者的无抗生素尿液通过微量稀释法测定尿液杀菌效价(UBT)。加替沙星的平均最大血浆浓度为3.35mg/l,环丙沙星为2.12mg/l。母体药物的平均(中位数)累积肾排泄量在120小时内加替沙星为给药剂量的81(83)%,环丙沙星为43(45)%。针对大肠杆菌ATCC参考菌株和9种临床尿路病原体,测定了UBT,即仍具有杀菌作用的尿液的最高两倍稀释度(以无抗生素尿液作为稀释剂),这些病原体对加替沙星/环丙沙星的最低抑菌浓度(mg/l)如下(微量稀释法,MHB):大肠杆菌ATCC 25922(0.008/0.008);大肠杆菌523(0.06/0.06);肺炎克雷伯菌1058(0.03/0.016);奇异变形杆菌524(0.125/0.016);铜绿假单胞菌561(1/0.125);粪肠球菌菌株60和55(0.5/1和8/32);金黄色葡萄球菌菌株248和596(均为0.03/0.125)以及腐生葡萄球菌Ho94(0.125/0.25)。加替沙星在前6小时内测定的中位数UBT对于包括铜绿假单胞菌在内的革兰氏阴性菌株在1:16至1:≥1024之间,对于5种革兰氏阳性菌株在1:8至1:≥1024之间。环丙沙星对于革兰氏阴性菌株(包括铜绿假单胞菌)的中位数UBT在1:64至1:≥1024之间,对于5种革兰氏阳性菌株在1:1.5至1:768之间。对于两种大肠杆菌菌株,在12<0.05小时的UBT无差异(P<0.05),但环丙沙星对克雷伯菌、变形杆菌和假单胞菌菌株优于加替沙星,而加替沙星对所有革兰氏阳性菌株优于环丙沙星。对于12 - 24小时的UBT,加替沙星总体上优于环丙沙星,但在变形杆菌和假单胞菌菌株中无差异。长达120小时的UBT - 时间曲线下面积(AUBT)显示,两种喹诺酮类药物之间在统计学上有显著(P)差异,在测试的10种菌株中有8种加替沙星更具优势,奇异变形杆菌无差异,环丙沙星对铜绿假单胞菌的活性显著更高。总之,加替沙星和环丙沙星总体上具有相当的初始尿液杀菌活性,对特定病原体存在一些差异,有时加替沙星更具优势(革兰氏阳性菌),有时环丙沙星更具优势(通常为革兰氏阴性菌),这表明对于经验性治疗,单次口服加替沙星(400mg)在临床上等同于每日两次口服环丙沙星(500mg)——这与先前在复杂性尿路感染中进行的一项临床研究结果一致[《国际抗菌剂杂志》(2004年)]。

相似文献

1
Urinary bactericidal activity, urinary excretion and plasma concentrations of gatifloxacin (400 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose.单次口服给药后,健康志愿者中加替沙星(400毫克)与环丙沙星(500毫克)的尿杀菌活性、尿排泄及血浆浓度比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Mar;23 Suppl 1:S6-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.09.006.
2
Concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion and bactericidal activity of levofloxacin (500 mg) versus ciprofloxacin (500 mg) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.单次口服剂量的左氧氟沙星(500毫克)与环丙沙星(500毫克)在健康志愿者体内的血浆浓度、尿排泄及杀菌活性比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Dec;28(6):551-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.07.026. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
3
Urinary bactericidal activity and pharmacokinetics of enoxacin versus norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in healthy volunteers after a single oral dose.单次口服给药后,依诺沙星与诺氟沙星和环丙沙星在健康志愿者体内的尿杀菌活性及药代动力学比较
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1998 Apr;10(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(98)00014-4.
4
Concentrations in plasma, urinary excretion, and bactericidal activity of linezolid (600 milligrams) versus those of ciprofloxacin (500 milligrams) in healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.健康志愿者单次口服给药后,利奈唑胺(600毫克)与环丙沙星(500毫克)的血浆浓度、尿排泄及杀菌活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Dec;47(12):3789-94. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3789-3794.2003.
5
Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones in healthy volunteers.新型氟喹诺酮类药物在健康志愿者体内的尿药浓度及杀菌活性
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Aug;24(2):168-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.01.013.
6
Urinary excretion and bactericidal activity of intravenous ciprofloxacin compared with oral ciprofloxacin.静脉注射环丙沙星与口服环丙沙星的尿排泄及杀菌活性比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Nov;18(11):783-9. doi: 10.1007/s100960050401.
7
Urinary excretion and bactericidal activities of a single oral dose of 400 milligrams of fleroxacin versus a single oral dose of 800 milligrams of pefloxacin in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者单次口服400毫克氟罗沙星与单次口服800毫克培氟沙星的尿排泄及杀菌活性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Jul;42(7):1659-65. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.7.1659.
8
Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin XR (1000 mg) versus levofloxacin (500 mg) in plasma and urine of male and female healthy volunteers receiving a single oral dose.单次口服剂量的环丙沙星缓释片(1000毫克)与左氧氟沙星(500毫克)在健康男女志愿者血浆和尿液中的药代动力学研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Jan;27(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.014. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
9
Urinary excretion and bactericidal activities of gemifloxacin and ofloxacin after a single oral dose in healthy volunteers.健康志愿者单次口服吉米沙星和氧氟沙星后的尿排泄及杀菌活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Dec;45(12):3524-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3524-3530.2001.
10
Urinary Concentrations and Antibacterial Activity of BAL30072, a Novel Siderophore Monosulfactam, against Uropathogens after Intravenous Administration in Healthy Subjects.新型铁载体单磺酰胺BAL30072在健康受试者静脉给药后对尿路病原体的尿药浓度及抗菌活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 May 23;60(6):3309-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02425-15. Print 2016 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasmid-Mediated Ciprofloxacin Resistance Imparts a Selective Advantage on Escherichia coli ST131.质粒介导的环丙沙星耐药性赋予大肠杆菌 ST131 选择性优势。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Jan 18;66(1):e0214621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02146-21. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Describe Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics Over the Entire Span of Life.一个描述环丙沙星药代动力学在整个生命周期内的生理基于药代动力学模型。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Dec;57(12):1613-1634. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0661-6.
3
Relationship of quantitative structure and pharmacokinetics in fluoroquinolone antibacterials.
氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物的定量结构与药代动力学的关系。
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 May 7;13(17):2496-503. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i17.2496.
4
Mutant prevention concentrations of fluoroquinolones for Enterobacteriaceae expressing the plasmid-carried quinolone resistance determinant qnrA1.表达质粒携带喹诺酮耐药决定子qnrA1的肠杆菌科细菌对氟喹诺酮类药物的突变预防浓度
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jun;51(6):2236-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01444-06. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
5
Pharmacokinetic characteristics of antimicrobials and optimal treatment of urosepsis.抗菌药物的药代动力学特征与尿脓毒症的优化治疗
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(4):291-305. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200746040-00003.
6
Antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients: a review of pathophysiological conditions responsible for altered disposition and pharmacokinetic variability.重症患者的抗菌治疗:对导致药物处置改变和药代动力学变异性的病理生理状况的综述。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(10):1009-34. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544100-00002.
7
Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the US.加替沙星:美国治疗细菌感染的应用综述
Drugs. 2005;65(5):695-724. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565050-00007.