Fuller T J, Knochel J P, Brennan J P, Fetner C D, White M G
Arch Intern Med. 1976 Sep;136(9):979-82.
Of 74 patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis who were observed during a 21-month period, seven developed uremic pericarditis. Five of these patients developed intractable pericarditis, unresponsive to intensive dialysis and pericardiocentesis, and were treated with prolonged pericardial drainage (16 to 60 hours) by an indwelling polyethylene catheter and instillation of triamcinolone hexacetonide. Evidence of intractability was based on either the recurrence of cardiac tamponade after pericardiocentesis (two patients) or progression in the size of the pericardial effusion despite four weeks of intensive dialysis (three patients). These five patients recovered and subsequently were observed from 1 to 15 months with no evidence of recurrent pericarditis. This procedure may be an effective alternative to the surgical management of intractable uremic pericarditis, particularly in the patient at high risk for anesthesia and major surgery.
在21个月的观察期内,对74例接受长期血液透析的患者进行了观察,其中7例发生了尿毒症心包炎。这些患者中有5例发生了顽固性心包炎,强化透析和心包穿刺均无效,采用留置聚乙烯导管进行长时间心包引流(16至60小时)并注入己曲安奈德进行治疗。顽固性的证据基于心包穿刺后心脏压塞复发(2例患者)或尽管进行了四周的强化透析心包积液仍增大(3例患者)。这5例患者康复,随后进行了1至15个月的观察,无复发性心包炎的迹象。该方法可能是顽固性尿毒症心包炎手术治疗的有效替代方法,尤其是对于麻醉和大手术高风险患者。