Heimer R
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8034.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998 May-Jun;15(3):183-91. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00220-1.
To determine how the city-run New Haven syringe exchange program (SEP) expedited requests, for entry into treatment, records of the SEP's drug treatment coordinator were analyzed. During the study period, a majority of those requesting treatment did not use the SEP to obtain sterile syringes. Comparisons between the people requesting treatment and those exchanging syringes revealed that those requesting treatment were more likely female and less like White. Factors associated with failure to enter treatment included long lag times, worse insurance, cocaine use, and requesting primary detoxification only. Majorities of the requests, appointments, and entries came from individuals whose treatment was to be paid through city welfare. A managed care initiative from the city welfare department, which excluded the SEP, halved requests or entries. Subsequent addition of the SEP to the initiative did not significantly increase requests or entries. Although the SEP initially acted as a conduit to treatment its effectiveness was curtailed by the imposition of bureaucratic restrictions.
为了确定纽黑文市运营的注射器交换项目(SEP)如何加快治疗准入申请流程,对SEP药物治疗协调员的记录进行了分析。在研究期间,大多数申请治疗的人并未通过SEP获取无菌注射器。申请治疗者与注射器交换者之间的比较显示,申请治疗者女性居多,白人较少。与未能进入治疗相关的因素包括长时间延迟、保险较差、使用可卡因以及仅要求进行初级戒毒。大多数申请、预约和入院者的治疗费用由城市福利支付。城市福利部门的一项管理式医疗举措(该举措将SEP排除在外)使申请或入院人数减半。随后将SEP纳入该举措并未显著增加申请或入院人数。尽管SEP最初充当了治疗的渠道,但其有效性因官僚主义限制而受到削弱。