• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾法:问题与建议。

Disability law: problems and proposals.

作者信息

Lande R G

出版信息

South Med J. 1998 Jun;91(6):518-21. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199806000-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00007611-199806000-00002
PMID:9634111
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medically disabled persons have traditionally encountered obstacles when seeking and maintaining employment. Integration of the medically disabled worker is the goal of recent legislation that directs removal of physical barriers and protects disabled workers from discrimination. The major force driving this social policy is the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).

METHODS

Current disability laws and related judicial opinions are reviewed. Primary attention is focused on the ADA.

RESULTS

Legislation addressing employment discrimination has serious deficiencies. Medical support of this important social policy is hampered by vague statutory definitions and seemingly capricious judicial opinions.

CONCLUSION

Disability laws require precise language identifying specific, qualifying medical conditions. The laws should require comprehensive medical assessment that objectively establishes a connection between a medical disorder and severe, sustained impairment. Some currently included conditions, such as personality disorders, should be considered for exclusion.

摘要

背景

传统上,身体有残疾的人在求职和维持就业方面会遇到障碍。让身体有残疾的工人融入社会是近期立法的目标,该立法旨在消除物质障碍,并保护残疾工人免受歧视。推动这项社会政策的主要力量是《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)。

方法

对现行的残疾法律和相关司法意见进行了审查。主要关注点是《美国残疾人法案》。

结果

解决就业歧视问题的立法存在严重缺陷。模糊的法定定义和看似任性的司法意见阻碍了对这一重要社会政策的医疗支持。

结论

残疾法律需要精确的语言来明确具体的合格医疗状况。法律应要求进行全面的医学评估,以客观地确定疾病与严重、持续损伤之间的联系。目前包括的一些状况,如人格障碍,应考虑予以排除。

相似文献

1
Disability law: problems and proposals.残疾法:问题与建议。
South Med J. 1998 Jun;91(6):518-21. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199806000-00002.
2
Navigating the Rolling Hills of Justice: Mental Disabilities, Employment and the Evolving Jurisprudence of the Americans with Disabilities Act.探索司法的起伏山峦:精神残疾、就业与《美国残疾人法案》不断演变的判例法
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Mar;35(2):178-185. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2282.
3
Empirical study of the Americans with Disabilities Act: employment issues from 1990 to 1994.《美国残疾人法案》实证研究:1990年至1994年的就业问题
Behav Sci Law. 1996 Winter;14(1):5-27. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199624)14:1<5::AID-BSL224>3.0.CO;2-6.
4
Psychiatric disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act: implications for policy and practice.精神疾病残疾与《美国残疾人法案》:对政策和实践的影响
J Health Soc Policy. 1998;10(3):1-12. doi: 10.1300/J045v10n03_01.
5
Americans with Disabilities Act. Receiving disability benefits does not bar ADA lawsuit.《美国残疾人法案》。领取残疾福利并不妨碍依据该法案提起诉讼。
AIDS Policy Law. 1997 Jan 24;12(1):7.
6
The impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act on employment opportunity for people with disabilities.《美国残疾人法案》对残疾人就业机会的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:91-105. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.000515.
7
Impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act on family physicians.《美国残疾人法案》对家庭医生的影响。
J Fam Pract. 1993 Feb;36(2):201-6.
8
Learning disabilities, employment discrimination, and the ADA.学习障碍、就业歧视与《美国残疾人法案》
J Learn Disabil. 1995 Apr;28(4):196-204. doi: 10.1177/002221949502800402.
9
Federal courts weigh impact of disability insurance applications on ADA claims.联邦法院权衡残疾保险申请对《美国残疾人法案》索赔的影响。
Employ Relat Today. 1998 Winter;24(4):99-108. doi: 10.1002/ert.3910240412.
10
Supreme Court explores nexus between ADA, social security.最高法院探究《美国残疾人法案》与社会保障之间的关系。
AIDS Policy Law. 1999 Mar 19;14(5):1, 6-7.